That's another reason I hate hoaxers. You get some idiot that wants to mess with everybody, so they put together some cheap film a 3 year old could make better, and post it as "proof x exists" and then everyone else who is halfway sane looks at it, scoffs at the hoaxer, and then labels all people who believe in "x" as crackpot morons. It's like the statements that keep referring to Bigfoot as a "human-ape Hybrid." Did I ever say I think human-ape hybrids are walking around? No I did not. I never once stated I think Bigfoot is a human-ape hybrid. Some people think that's exactly what Bigfoot is. Many more do not.

The real problem this comes down to, and why so many scoff at people like me, Darkk, TimeDragon, and others who believe in the possibility of these creatures existing, is people who make hoaxes. Be they professional grade hoaxes, with high quality, realistic looking videos, or childish hoaxers who film things purposefully grainy and/or blurry, OR use obvious CGI; all of them have one thing in common: They make the rest of us look completely stupid.

I have to disagree with the idea that Bigfoot is "too big" for us to have never come across it by now. Also, the creature is not restricted to just one part of the world, as that person (can't remember who posted it, don't want to lose this post to go back to the last page and find it), said in their post. The Yetti is the arctic's version of Bigfoot; it's the same creature, only instead of being seen in the jungle, it's seen in snowy mountainous terrain instead. But that's just me; I am able to believe it's possible for us not to have discovered it yet, because in reality, Bigfoot isn't all that big. It's only a foot or two taller than humans, and compared to many of the animals around, we humans aren't very big either. Plus, the fact is, if we are still discovering new (animal) life on this planet, what's to say that we won't one day find whatever is responsible for all the Bigfoot sightings?

~SilverWolf~