Thread: Who will you vote for? UPDATED

Not really...

I'll give him credit for studying Joel Osteen and completely inmitating him, but otherwise he's a flake.

Lots of talk with not a lot of experience.

Clinton has experience in the WH, and that's what counts.

Not to mention her involvment in other international affairs and her plans for healthcare.

seis i hate to put it this way. But North america is in great dangr right now. and the outcome of this election may ultimately decide the fate based on which direction we go in.
The US currency is being destroyed by central banks who want to introduce a Universal currency for north america. Problem, Reaction, Solution.

Problem: US dollar going down, soon to be stock market crash.

Reaction: the general public goes "Oh noes!!! WTF do we do? what is the government going to do about it?

solution: Central bank puppets in government, "well the amero sounds good, we are even thinking of eventually having it as an electronic currency. Paper money is now becoming obsolete."

and yet again The average dumb citisen gets yet another right, and freedom taken away. RP is the only candidate who won't allow that to happen if he gets in office. And who the fuck cares, where he gets his info from? We all get info from other sources and people. We are all influenced by people who were influenced by other people. You're argument is retarded and invalid.

What argument? I made a statement.

clinton = annoying
huckabee = out
mccain = old/like bush: thinks war is just a state that the country is in (cant say because hes rich, obama was born rich)

I picked Obama (WHO ISNT A FUCKIN MUSLIM). For sake of arguement, where is Nader?

Originally Posted by Seismosaur

What argument? I made a statement.

statements contain arguments, or at least are the results of arguments. prepare to be challenged. I speak my mind.

Originally Posted by Seismosaur

and her plans for healthcare.

You know universal health care is a socialist idea, right?

Originally Posted by Grod

You know universal health care is a socialist idea, right?

Social progression in the US is a big no-no.

Originally Posted by Spartiate

Social progression in the US is a big no-no.

Originally Posted by Lord Bennington

I don't think we should get into a war with Iran. Honestly, it's pointless. What we need to do is send a few nukes their way. If all of the Middle East is destroyed in the process, they had some WMD's. If not, they hate us anyway and were going to get some and kill us. Win-win situation.

Very, very ignorant.

Originally Posted by Elis D.

Wow, talk about American fucking Ignorance.

A win-win is causing a nuclear holocaust?

They don't "all hate us anyway" they hate that our government is so arrogant to try and force Western Ideals on the rest of the world, they hate that we constantly try to police the world, they hate that we've been bombing the Middle East regularly since 1991 with no excuse to do so.

EDUCATE YOURSELF before you spew hate like this, please.

Well put, Elis.

Originally Posted by Xox

Well put, Elis.

Anything for you

Originally Posted by Grod

You know universal health care is a socialist idea, right?

Socialism will prevail!!!!

Originally Posted by dragonoverlord

Socialism will prevail!!!!

History tells us otherwise...

Originally Posted by Grod

History tells us otherwise...

Umm....get ready for round 2!

Originally Posted by Seismosaur

Not really...

I'll give him credit for studying Joel Osteen and completely inmitating him, but otherwise he's a flake.

Lots of talk with not a lot of experience.

Clinton has experience in the WH, and that's what counts.

Not to mention her involvment in other international affairs and her plans for healthcare.

The experience Clinton "claims" to have over Obama...is just that of being the "First Lady." Obama has accomplished far more if you ask me, he's gotten in the trenches and done his fair share of work.

she has more white house experience. She has been in the white house during many tough decisions and she has an idea of whats important and whats no so important. Other than that, Obama has had more time holding office. Obama still has my vote, she is annoying. I have heard many women dont like her because they feel she conceded to her husband when he cheated on her.

Originally Posted by Seismosaur

Not really...

I'll give him credit for studying Joel Osteen and completely inmitating him, but otherwise he's a flake.

Lots of talk with not a lot of experience.

Clinton has experience in the WH, and that's what counts.

Not to mention her involvment in other international affairs and her plans for healthcare.

What experiance? She was the first lady, not the president. She has experiance living in the white house, not running the country.