Thread: History of the Aryan bloodline...what you were never meant to know.

Originally Posted by Schmaven

Planets do not have their own special rules of physics. I doubt planets colliding would result in an inelastic collision.

This belief that planets cannot collide inelastically, is this based on some deep physical insight or pure speculation? In fact, the general rule is the larger the objects get, the more inelastic collisions get. For example, atoms and molecules cannot be permanently deformed by collisions (or else DNA would be impossible!), but billiard balls, if hit hard enough, can take dents. Moving up in scale, cars get enormously deformed in collisions, rather than simply bouncing off one another. Moving up again, have you ever seen a tall tower fall over sideways? The tower always splits at least once, because no material known to man is strong enough to prevent a large object from behaving inelastically. Moving up in scale again, we get to earth quakes causing a local region of the crust to liquifact, or in other words causes stone to turn to liquid. And once we get up to the scale of planets, most collisions look like two blobs of liquid colliding, because planets are made of rock, and no natural rock can come within even an order of magnitude of the strength required to behave elastically.

U R RONG

Originally Posted by Schmaven

However I do believe that in the event of a collision, the damage to each planet would be catastrophic to both the planet's geography and any life living on it.

Yeah. Good thing the Earth was still molten and completely lifeless at the time.

Originally Posted by drewmandan

This belief that planets cannot collide inelastically, is this based on some deep physical insight or pure speculation? In fact, the general rule is the larger the objects get, the more inelastic collisions get. For example, atoms and molecules cannot be permanently deformed by collisions (or else DNA would be impossible!), but billiard balls, if hit hard enough, can take dents. Moving up in scale, cars get enormously deformed in collisions, rather than simply bouncing off one another. Moving up again, have you ever seen a tall tower fall over sideways? The tower always splits at least once, because no material known to man is strong enough to prevent a large object from behaving inelastically. Moving up in scale again, we get to earth quakes causing a local region of the crust to liquifact, or in other words causes stone to turn to liquid. And once we get up to the scale of planets, most collisions look like two blobs of liquid colliding, because planets are made of rock, and no natural rock can come within even an order of magnitude of the strength required to behave elastically.

U R RONG

My conclusions are based on my current knowledge of physics, mixed in with some common sense applied to a larger scale. It is exactly the deformation of objects that leads to their elasticity. It may not seem that way, but even solid objects deform upon impact. It is the tendency for objects to try to return to their original shape that leads to the bouncing effect.

What you are proposing is two bodies colliding, assuming their composition can be considered mostly liquid. If indeed these two bodies collided inelastically (stuck together), then the 10th planet does not exist. There have been claims both for and against the existence of this planet.

I am suggesting that the planets were moving fast enough to overcome their separate gravitational forces as to not become one. Also, I think that both planets had a high density core (the specific composition of which I don't care about), that could exhibit some deformation followed by a reformation that would further help the planets remain separate entities.

In 4 days, I start System Dynamics, Materials Science, Fluid Dynamics and 3 other fun classes. So there is a chance I'll learn more about the physics of such a collision and will be able to shed more light on the subject. I admit that as of now, my knowledge is limited, but taking into consideration what I currently know, I feel my position is justified.

On an unrelated note: wow 500 posts!!! ...I need a life hahaha

Originally Posted by Schmaven

My conclusions are based on my current knowledge of physics, mixed in with some common sense applied to a larger scale. It is exactly the deformation of objects that leads to their elasticity. It may not seem that way, but even solid objects deform upon impact. It is the tendency for objects to try to return to their original shape that leads to the bouncing effect.

What you are proposing is two bodies colliding, assuming their composition can be considered mostly liquid. If indeed these two bodies collided inelastically (stuck together), then the 10th planet does not exist. There have been claims both for and against the existence of this planet.

I am suggesting that the planets were moving fast enough to overcome their separate gravitational forces as to not become one. Also, I think that both planets had a high density core (the specific composition of which I don't care about), that could exhibit some deformation followed by a reformation that would further help the planets remain separate entities.

In 4 days, I start System Dynamics, Materials Science, Fluid Dynamics and 3 other fun classes. So there is a chance I'll learn more about the physics of such a collision and will be able to shed more light on the subject. I admit that as of now, my knowledge is limited, but taking into consideration what I currently know, I feel my position is justified.

On an unrelated note: wow 500 posts!!! ...I need a life hahaha

Your teachers should fail you for not knowing the definition of "elastic collision". I'm done with you.

Am I not correct in the statement that two bodies colliding and sticking together is an inelastic collision?

Originally Posted by drewmandan

Your teachers should fail you for not knowing the definition of "elastic collision". I'm done with you.

^ right back at you :-)

If this is all true, then what about people like me who have blond hair but green eyes? and I mean greeeen, not hazel. What would that be the result of? also people who are the opposite...brown hair with blue eyes. are we like half half bloods?

That's where genetics comes into play with evolution. If you have someone with blond hair and blue eyes have sex with someone with green eyes and brown hair, their offspring could end up with blond hair and green eyes, or brown hair and green eyes, or blond hair and blue eyes etc.

Oh, I know, Im just talking about from his perspective, cause I think all humans were suppose to have brown eyes before this.

but, my parents were brown eyes brown hair, and blue eyes red hair....Im actually the only out of 5 kids to NOT have brown hair and brown eyes, hehe

Brown eye color is a dominant gene. You just got lucky in the genetic lottery.

yes, I remember that from bio, but green eyes are not in either of my parents or any of my grandparents. so it must have traveled a long ways for not being dominant.

Thanks for posting. Interesting read.

Originally Posted by tkdyo

yes, I remember that from bio, but green eyes are not in either of my parents or any of my grandparents. so it must have traveled a long ways for not being dominant.

Um. Adultery?

lol, nice. It could be, but Im still interested to hear where Jeff thinks green eyes came from.

You are the smartest person who ever lived.

This is crazy, you did all this research and such on your own?

In resposne to Keeper, and this quote:

Well that might (or might not ) be true, what you quoted came from the OT, which is also in the hands of the Jewish people. Are you saying that the history of the Jews (as, to the best of my knowledge) that is their history, is inaccurate when compared to potentially older civilizations?

One thing that is pertinent to all studies and examinations of "sacred" writings is that they become altered over the centuries. And the Jewsih people have no ability to avoid this alteration, just as Christians have not had that ability.

Now as far as the Nicean Council of the Catholic Church: The Nicean Council of the early 300's (316 AD I think it was) discarded the gospel of Mary Magdalene, the gospel of Thomas, and other writings. The writings of "St Paul" were included, and almost every RW Christian I know quotes Paul when saying that the New Testament allows for war. (They will even try to point out that the writings of St Paul include our rationale for fighting the Muslim world, even though the Muslim world did not exist in St Paul's day.) The Council also banned the idea of reincarnation, although properly translated sections of Christ's own words indicate his belief in Reincarnation. Also, certain people were excommunicated, post humously!

But the Council managed to put together teachings that would support war and subjugtaion of women. While allowig the Church itself to become more and more bureaucratic.

You're a powerful necromancer indeed.

Gotta hope Jeff comes across this thread and sees what a huge derp he was.

Originally Posted by Carôusoul

Gotta hope Jeff comes across this thread and sees what a huge derp he was.

Oh, you

Someone has the winter pricklies.

Originally Posted by Taosaur

Someone has the winter pricklies.

If you were here I'd slap you.

You dirty, dirty, bitch.

Oh fuck.... I just read the entire OP and then saw Merlock posted.... massive wtf.
2008....

Fuck you noob necro fuck.

I didn't even think to check whether it was old coz Jeff has been away again for quite a while.

Wonder what he's doing now?

Almost definitely self flagellating in to a CD of Mayan chants before a ten foot statue of Imhotep, wearing only jackboots.

Seems likely.

This is in no way meaning to say that I believe this is true, but honestly it's far more interesting and believable than Christianity or any of the other major religions out there, to me. Not any of the specifics, just the ancient aliens theory in general. However, I figure it's a given that Christianity/any major religions today aren't that believable anyway. At least, as far as I know, no one is killing or denying the rights of anybody else in the name of the Annunaki.

I dedicate a virgin to the Annunaki every fortnight, and just for practical purposes they stay chained in the basement anywhere from three to five days. Why, one time I caught two at once, and the second one was naked and living on cat food for a good three weeks.