Thread: "Why do I like boys?"

I suppose not, I just lost track of my own arguments and forgot where I was heading. And why I wanted there not to be a gay-gene.

I think, initially, I was just trying to say that nobody really knows why some people are attracted to different things.

Why are scientists wasting their precious time and money researching for the gay gene, anyway? They could be searching for the allergy gene, the aggressive gene, the ethics gene, the intelligence gene, etc.

Obviously because aggression is an instict, and we already know what it is.
And because science researches everything, and doesn't run away from the topics certain people don't like.

Originally Posted by Kromoh

Why are scientists wasting their precious time and money researching for the gay gene, anyway? They could be searching for the allergy gene, the aggressive gene, the ethics gene, the intelligence gene, etc.

They are researching all of those "genes", as well as scientists have particular fields. It makes sense to be as broad in the medical field as possible, rather than putting all of our scientists on any select gene whilst neglecting research in another. Knowledge is power .

Not to mention you can't such say "[insert anything here] gene".

Originally Posted by Timothy Paradox

Not to mention you can't such say "[insert anything here] gene".

That is because we don't know if it's a single gene, a combination of genes, a combination of genes and environment, or environment purely. That's what I meant in my post. Allergy gene? There are so many different types of allergy it's even dumb.

Originally Posted by Jeff777

Let's keep the topic to what it was originally intended be about, and not about the support of pedophilia. Kthnxbai.

+1

Originally Posted by Maroon_Sweater

Girls are extremely complicated. I honestly can't tell you why, unless I really got to know you, but to just throw it out there- It's probably the familiarity.

Girls aren't complicated, they just try to be.

Originally Posted by NeoSioType

Girls aren't complicated, they just try to be.

Random statement of the day. I'm not so sure I completely, actually at all, agree with this. Big generalisation.

Eight-year-olds, Dude.

Originally Posted by ClouD

Random statement of the day. I'm not so sure I completely, actually at all, agree with this. Big generalisation.

I agree with it, actually. Maybe because I've grown up amidst so many women (maybe not), I don't think women complicated at all. As in, they aren't complicated to analyse, but like to complicate things for themselves. Nothing like the straightforwardness and logical intuition of a man.

The only reason, at least in my opinion, to say that women are complicated/more complicated than men is if you haven't really tried to understand the opposite gender as well as you could. If you truely take the time to understand the way women think, it's not all that complicated.

right.. so without reading anything not on the first page, I will attempt to solve everyone's problems in this thread.

Cloud: So you like boys, good on ya. If you decide you don't later on, its all good too.

No-name: Really? You're gay? No offense but didn't see that one coming.

Maeni: Stand up for yourself more. Don't let people judge you, its not their business.

Jeff: I KNOW RIGHT? WHO WOULD HAVE KNOW NN LIKED GUYS!

Kromoh: You don't have problems, except your avatar.

See, now wasn't that helpful?

I feel straight most of the time, but I see where you're coming from. I feel I can connect better with guys. Woman can be a pain.

Im not gay. But i do find it easier to make friends with another male rather than a female. That's because guys dont talk as much/show as much emotion so theres really not a whole lot of drama, just good old fashioned companionship

You're all faggots

My opinion on this is that human sexuality can be attracted to anything it wants to. There are humans who are sexually attracted to horses. Does that mean their attraction is natural? The FOS I use is that if you were a feral child who was raised by cows, then you'd certainly be sexually attracted by cows. The same can apply to everything... sometimes I got aroused when my mother carressed my hair. Does that mean I was attracted to her? Likewise, some people get aroused when they carress children. The point I'm trying to make is that if you fixate on that feeling, if you fixate on the feeling of being aroused, then you're gonna trap yourself into a psychological prison of rigid lines and you're gonna make yourself believe that you can only feel attraction for this, and not for that, while in reality, sexuality is more like water than like stone.

This is the biggest problem for people to realize, to stop being guilty over what they feel, to stop fixating on what they feel for, and understand feeling for what it simply is: feeling itself. If you can do this, then you can have peadophilic feelings, animalistic feelings, incestual feelings, and everything else under the stars, but keep yourself under control in the understanding that although the feelings are expressed in the mind, they should stay within the mind as well. In the end, sexual feelings are very innocent and go back to the time when we are children, being carressed by our parents and loved ones. The problem starts when you mature, and sexual feelings develop a physical outlet (erect penis/vagina). The problem, of course, is more difficult for men to control because the penis is an exerting force, while the vagina is more of a force of innertia, which is why men are more prone to sexually abuse people or rape. But that doesn't mean it's impossible to control desires if you are a man... it just means it is harder.

So what is the solution: to retain that innocence, retain the innocent feeling of childhood sexuality without letting it be overwhelmed by the more sinful changes that come with maturity, and to try and controll one's desires unless they are used on a person who is suitable and won't do him/her anyone any deep psychological harm.

If we understand human nature for what it is (much more complicated than anyone knows, and much less structured than what people make it out to be), then we can control ourselves and reach a point of equilibrium with our individual natures. That balance, that equilibrium, for me, lies when the positive force of manhood and the negative force of womanhood combine into one through sexual act. Any other sexual connection, to me, will never reach the level of purity and equilibrium as that when a man and a woman converge. But each to his own.

Fixation will make a person believe anything he/she wants to, and overlook the fact that they are anything they want to be, and not one thing in particular.

Originally Posted by Siblesz

My opinion on this is that human sexuality can be attracted to anything it wants to. There are humans who are sexually attracted to horses. Does that mean their attraction is natural? The FOS I use is that if you were a feral child who was raised by cows, then you'd certainly be sexually attracted by cows. The same can apply to everything... sometimes I got aroused when my mother carressed my hair. Does that mean I was attracted to her? Likewise, some people get aroused when they carress children. The point I'm trying to make is that if you fixate on that feeling, if you fixate on the feeling of being aroused, then you're gonna trap yourself into a psychological prison of rigid lines and you're gonna make yourself believe that you can only feel attraction for this, and not for that, while in reality, sexuality is more like water than like stone.

This is the biggest problem for people to realize, to stop being guilty over what they feel, to stop fixating on what they feel for, and understand feeling for what it simply is: feeling itself. If you can do this, then you can have peadophilic feelings, animalistic feelings, incestual feelings, and everything else under the stars, but keep yourself under control in the understanding that although the feelings are expressed in the mind, they should stay within the mind as well. In the end, sexual feelings are very innocent and go back to the time when we are children, being carressed by our parents and loved ones. The problem starts when you mature, and sexual feelings develop a physical outlet (erect penis/vagina). The problem, of course, is more difficult for men to control because the penis is an exerting force, while the vagina is more of a force of innertia, which is why men are more prone to sexually abuse people or rape. But that doesn't mean it's impossible to control desires if you are a man... it just means it is harder.

So what is the solution: to retain that innocence, retain the innocent feeling of childhood sexuality without letting it be overwhelmed by the more sinful changes that come with maturity, and to try and controll one's desires unless they are used on a person who is suitable and won't do him/her anyone any deep psychological harm.

If we understand human nature for what it is (much more complicated than anyone knows, and much less structured than what people make it out to be), then we can control ourselves and reach a point of equilibrium with our individual natures. That balance, that equilibrium, for me, lies when the positive force of manhood and the negative force of womanhood combine into one through sexual act. Any other sexual connection, to me, will never reach the level of purity and equilibrium as that when a man and a woman converge. But each to his own.

Fixation will make a person believe anything he/she wants to, and overlook the fact that they are anything they want to be, and not one thing in particular.

An amazing first post.
Welcome to DV.

Originally Posted by Fableflame

An amazing first post.
Welcome to DV.

Amazing 1,010th post.

Please continue

Originally Posted by juroara

I wish I liked them more but either boys arent showering enough or forgetting to put on deodorant!

hahaha, the words of a budding lesbian

im not homo sexual, i dont find any attraction to guys, but i think i would do a M>F tranny if she had looked enough like a girl

Originally Posted by sheogorath

im not homo sexual, i dont find any attraction to guys, but i think i would do a M>F tranny if she had looked enough like a girl

Hmm. Seems pretty homosexual to me.

Originally Posted by grasshoppa

Hmm. Seems pretty homosexual to me.

No, not really. If you look away from the DNA it's pretty much a girl.

Originally Posted by sheogorath

im not homo sexual, i dont find any attraction to guys, but i think i would do a M>F tranny if she had looked enough like a girl

you would probably like a hentai called "bible black"

and maybe you, too, khh - lol