Quote Originally Posted by Universal Mind View Post
I didn't ask you what type of government is the best. I asked you what other type of freedom oriented government there is. I don't mean the mere freedom to judge a government inside their heads.

If the people do not rule, are they free?
You're asking my political opinion. I did not want to give it.

The answer is way longer than that. He talks at first about how our infidels are on their ethnocentric holy land, but then he gets into how we allow stock trade, female models, legal alcohol, investment interest, not having the Koran as a law book, and all kinds of other things. He says that the "Islamic nation" will not call off their war on us until we give up all of those things and other freedoms.
I asked you to quote me someone against explicitly "freedom" and you referenced me Q2 - not the whole thing. I will now use the holy ctrl+f command to look for "freedom" - nothing else:
"This argument contradicts your continuous repetition that America is the land of freedom, and its leaders in this world"
"The religion of the Unification of God; of freedom from associating partners with Him, and rejection of this; of complete love of Him"
"You are a nation that permits acts of immorality, and you consider them to be pillars of personal freedom."
"Giant corporations and establishments are established on this, under the name of art, entertainment, tourism and freedom, and other deceptive names you attribute to it."
"How many acts of oppression, tyranny and injustice have you carried out, O callers to freedom?"
"The freedom and democracy that you call to is for yourselves and for white race only"

After this, it is now more abundantly clear that your own article can be used against your point. He is arguing the nature of freedom. This was my point. You have your own opinion on what political and governing party offers freedom, and so does he. You can argue about that, but the point is that he is for freedom and believes that democracy is against it.

~