 Originally Posted by DuB
It wouldn't prevent "social engineering" at all. It would only move such engineering to the state level. Just think about what the biology curriculum would look like in Dover, Pennsylvania if the federal government hadn't intervened. You mean to tell me that downplaying the biological role of evolution and teaching "intelligent design" as an alternative isn't social engineering?
Your argument is completely illogical. You are giving the premise that "Intelligent Design" would over-take education all across the U.S.. Due to our system of government, if that were the case, then "Evolution" would already be banned from the education system. If education were handled at the state level, some states would pick "Intelligent Design" over "Evolution", but not the majority.
Sure, that is social engineering. The difference is that it wouldn't be organized.
|
|
Bookmarks