Thread: Homosexuality, how can it not be considered an abnormality?

Originally Posted by Zezarict

Just 'cause i'm 14, it doesn't mean you shouldn't listen.

I'm sorry what was that, i wasn't listening.

Originally Posted by MementoMori

I'm sorry what was that, i wasn't listening.

ha ha, stay on topic...

Originally Posted by Zezarict

ha ha, stay on topic...

I was trying but you spoke so low, lol jk

I've stated this before, IMO if it can exist at all it's normal. Because to me anything that occurs in the universe is natural because it has produced itself as a part of existence.

So Homosexuality is just another thing that occurred in the universe and their are no laws in the universe that i know of that say Homosexuality shouldn't exist....

thatperson, you're presuming that you or we humans know the intentions of nature (according to you nature has intentions for humans) and that we fully understand whatever plan there is. There is a thing called change and it occurs quite often in this universe. Nothing is certain and nothing lasts forever that we know of except for energy... So just because we started off straight doesn't mean we'll end that way or should end that way. We also started off with organs we didn't need. We also started off shorter, lived less years than we do now, and many other things but over time we've changed. Whose to say Homosexuality isn't a part of the "plan" or "schematics" you're speaking of? you can't honestly claim that you know the true underlying scheme of the human existence and what we're "supposed to do and be" can you?

Sex is supposed to feel good, that is why we have sensitive sexual bits that feel good when touched. It doesn't matter if a man or woman is touching you in sexual ways, it feels the same regardless. There is no logical reason why a person wouldn't feel the same pleasure weather a man or woman was touching them.

If you blind folded a straight man and had another man with soft hands rub him, he would probably react the same way as if a woman did it. And a gay man would probably react in the same way in both situations. Because there is no real way to tell the difference.

Clearly nothing is broken when gay people receive pleasure from their own gender touching them. Its just natural. If a person says they don't want children, then I am going to assume they just don't like children. We are not animals. There is nothing wrong with not wanting children. So I wouldn't say anyone is lacking just because they don't want children. In a case where they do not want children there is no difference between being gay or straight. It is simply a preference.

Originally Posted by Alric

Sex is supposed to feel good, that is why we have sensitive sexual bits that feel good when touched. It doesn't matter if a man or woman is touching you in sexual ways, it feels the same regardless. There is no logical reason why a person wouldn't feel the same pleasure weather a man or woman was touching them.

If you blind folded a straight man and had another man with soft hands rub him, he would probably react the same way as if a woman did it. And a gay man would probably react in the same way in both situations. Because there is no real way to tell the difference.

Clearly nothing is broken when gay people receive pleasure from their own gender touching them. Its just natural. If a person says they don't want children, then I am going to assume they just don't like children. We are not animals. There is nothing wrong with not wanting children. So I wouldn't say anyone is lacking just because they don't want children. In a case where they do not want children there is no difference between being gay or straight. It is simply a preference.

There is more to being gay than getting touched by somebody of the same sex, just saying.