A possible theory on dream characters

**gleixer** · 03-11-2014 07:30 PM

What if every dream character that you see in your dreams were actually different versions of yourself that happened to be dreaming at that same time? This is assuming that quantum mechanics/physics are valid. But still, maybe that is why asking your dream for answers works all the time. Because it has all of the knowledge that all of the versions of you have.....

**splodeymissile** · 03-11-2014 07:43 PM

Wouldn't this imply that there is some sort of "in-between world" that we all go to when we dream? Either way,it would seem like the barriers between universes are astoundingly weak and makes me wonder why we can't meet up in waking life. Its certainly an interesting theory, but one I don't hold to be particularly valid, especially when we bring shared dreaming into this (not that I believe in that, either). It sounds like we're trying to put special properties onto dreams, when we really don't need to.

**Tygar** · 03-11-2014 08:07 PM

Interesting theory. I believe all DCs are figments of your expectations.

**PKJacker** · 03-11-2014 10:36 PM

I don't really think that is the case for my DC's since almost every single one of them except for like 2 per dream only do one action in the dream then disappear.
I feel like my variations wouldn't be so linear.

**Sensei** · 03-11-2014 10:39 PM

Funny, I had a lucid dream like this once.

This is why I incubate dreams. - Dream Journals - Lucid Dreaming - Dream Views

According to this DC, all other "me's" are dead... I hope not. I need to be more wary of my sisters. lol.

**Screen** · 03-12-2014 04:26 PM

Brandon: read that dream entry, and some very freaky but interesting stuff. I wonder--if possible--there's any truth to what your other self told you.

I'm working on my own leads in regards to dream characters. The next chance I get, I plan to ask my subconscious about dream characters and what exactly are they.

I wonder if they're like every object in the dream world where it gains "self-awareness" by expectation and intent. Hell, if you wanted to, you could talk to a wall that ordinarily wouldn't have done or said anything. That's what I'm wondering: if they're just another building block to the dream, and not actually people.

If that's true, it makes me wonder who or what we're exactly communicating with if it's not literally an object and possibly not even a person. Could it just be our subconscious which is present in everyone and everything? Who can say for sure.

**gleixer** · 03-15-2014 04:59 PM

The subcon. mind is probably something we as humans have not explored yet to its fullest extent. So I wouldn't be surprised truthfully

**Sensei** · 03-15-2014 06:00 PM

Originally Posted by gleixer

The subcon. mind is probably something we as humans have not explored yet to its fullest extent. So I wouldn't be surprised truthfully

There is soooo much humans haven't discovered. So to say that anything is impossible is really just to say that it is improbable or cannot correspond with ny beliefs.

**gleixer** · 03-16-2014 05:25 AM

Originally Posted by BrandonBoss

There is soooo much humans haven't discovered. So to say that anything is impossible is really just to say that it is improbable or cannot correspond with ny beliefs.

Too true. The only thing that is holding us back is some of people's narrow mindedness. In my opinion, our imagination is the limit