Thread: if LDing is real then what about. . .

Ok people. I gave you the proof, the scientific evidence. Scientific studies prove its real. You cant argue with science, I'm sorry. You asked for the proof, we provided. And parapsycology includes PK.

"Ok people. I gave you the proof, the scientific evidence. Scientific studies prove its real. You cant argue with science, I'm sorry. You asked for the proof, we provided. And parapsycology includes PK."

Scientific studies like wikipedia and Uri Geller?

There is no scientific evidence for any of that nonsense.

The answer to the original question - if LD is real, what about the other stuff? Is this: Lucid Dreaming does not involve supernatural forces or souls. Lucid dreaming is simply having a conscious portion of your brain active while your body sleeps. To go from being aware that you're dreaming to believing in telekinesis, big foot, or esp is a BIG leap.

Originally Posted by magicdood

Oneironaught- The fact that others have failed, still does not make me or psychokinesis a fake. It simply doesn't. All it states is that many people want to get rich, doing fake things.

Now, with that, I agree 100%

Originally Posted by thegnome54

Is this: Lucid Dreaming does not involve supernatural forces or souls. Lucid dreaming is simply having a conscious portion of your brain active while your body sleeps. To go from being aware that you're dreaming to believing in telekinesis, big foot, or esp is a BIG leap.

Exactly my underlying point. Thank you.

Originally Posted by thegnome54

"Ok people. I gave you the proof, the scientific evidence. Scientific studies prove its real. You cant argue with science, I'm sorry. You asked for the proof, we provided. And parapsycology includes PK."

Scientific studies like wikipedia and Uri Geller?

There is no scientific evidence for any of that nonsense.

Gumby made an earlier post listing many scientific websites providing proof towards parapsychology. Please go read his post before you post nonsense like that.

Oneironaught- And also, that is a huge leap. I'm wondering how that was even brought up with LD'ing hehe. They are sooo different. But no matter!

Originally Posted by magicdood

Gumby made an earlier post listing many scientific websites providing proof towards parapsychology. Please go read his post before you post nonsense like that.

I did read his post. Did you?!

Those links are all nonsense, sites trying to sell memberships, books, tapes, random vague references to experiments which probably never occured...

The FACT IS, lucid dreaming has nothing to do with the paranormal or spiritual or supernatural, or ANY of that stuff. Lucid dreaming is simply that - dreaming while conscious. If you think that makes it more likely that your neuronal action potentials can somehow move objects not in physical contact with you, or that wolf prints in snow which melted and became larger were made by bigfoot, or that intense hallucinations caused by lack of blood flow and massive head trauma are really trips to the garden of eden... well, THAT'S nonsense.

Originally Posted by thegnome54

I did read his post. Did you?!

I also read his post, and commented on the big "Fraud" section of his first link. Nobody seemed on the Psi end seemed to notice that one for some reason.

Oneironaught- He is not being logical and sensible. Logical and sensible would be weighing all the options. Currently he's just flaming me/us. Nothing logical about that. I don't need to provide proof. I would need to provide proof if I cared whether you believe me or not. But I don't, so no need for that!

Originally Posted by magicdood

Oneironaught- He is not being logical and sensible. Logical and sensible would be weighing all the options. Currently he's just flaming me/us. Nothing logical about that. I don't need to provide proof. I would need to provide proof if I cared whether you believe me or not. But I don't, so no need for that!

You do care. That's why you keep coming back with "Guys, I can really do it" instead of just leaving. If you don't care, why are you trying to sway our opinion?