thanks. |
|
thanks. |
|
Last edited by Matt5678; 08-03-2007 at 02:24 AM.
my problem with this video is they don't finish thinking about the subject at hand. They should have actually listened to the writer who was "out to make a buck." He had a good point in saying that the believers and the disbelievers were in the same boat, the believers being the ones who think accounts of ND OOBEs prove anything and the nonbelievers being the ones who believe that a physiological reasoning proves there isn't an "afterlife." THE FACT THERE IS PHYSIOLOGICAL EVIDENCE THAT OOBES ARE A NATURAL OCCURANCE IN THE BRAIN DOES NOT IN ANYWAY PROVE THERE ISN'T SPIRITUAL OR OTHERWORLDLY SIGNIFICANCE. That is, I believe, what Dr. Moody's point was. |
|
sorry for the rant, Penn and Teller just really should think more openmindedly about the whole thing... they are just so smug. |
|
i totally absolutely agree jamous, i was wondering if that writer they made fun of knew what was happening. poor women probably really believed what happened to her and didn’t know she was invited on a show just to be made fun of |
|
Last edited by Matt5678; 08-04-2007 at 05:25 AM.
seriously, they hypocritically criticized the writer who made more sense than they did, and made out these people who were only reporting they're personal experiences to be fools, just because they believed there was meaning in their NDEs. I have no problem with Atheists, just being a smug asshole about it. |
|
I don't know why people discuss more about Penn and Teller than the topic itself |
|
Saying quantum physics explains cognitive processes is just like saying geology explains jurisprudence.
_________________________________________
We now return you to our regularly scheduled signature, already in progress.
_________________________________________
My Music
The Ear Is Always Correct - thoughts on music composition
What Sky Saw - a lucid dreaming journal
Thoughts are physical? For such a Science-Fan you sure suck at logics. So what does a thought look like? What's it feel like? How big is a tought? I mean, come on man; Have you ever caught and touched a Thought? Sounds like you are more delusional than all spiritualists together in a swimmingpool full of LSD. |
|
Last edited by SKA; 08-04-2007 at 05:04 PM.
Luminous Spacious Dream Masters That Holographically Communicate
among other teachers taught me
not to overestimate the Value of our Concrete Knowledge;"Common sense"/Rationality,
for doing so would make us Blind for the unimaginable, unparalleled Capacity of and Wisdom contained within our Felt Knowledge;Subconscious Intuition.
|
|
I've seen that episode that doen't prove OBE's wrong it may say that some exeperiences are false, I mean if you tell someone to see somehting they will see it, it's just those people arn't used to telling their minds to do something so they have never done it and when they do it the first time, they someone think it's paranormal. |
|
I wanna be the very best
Like no one ever was
To lucid dream is my real test
To control them is my cause
I personally don't believe in OBE's or NDE's because they are all too similar to dreams or hallucinations. Think about it, if you are religious and have say followed the bible most of your life and are a good person, you are expecting to get into what the religion calls heaven, now if you are about to die you may have accepted death and the most dominant thought is most likely going to be heaven and just like with a dream you can think about something before you go to bed and dream about it. Its similar and like they said with the brain being depreived of blood you will probably hallucinate or black out and to see such strange things would be normal, nothing paranormal or what not. Well thats my two cents on the video. |
|
This debate is currently one of the most important ones, if not the most influential, between philosophy and science. |
|
Last edited by Mocari; 08-04-2007 at 09:39 PM.
you're right. I am about positive they should be under the same category. But I tend to believe that dreams and hallucinations are, on some levels, of spiritual or religious significance. I have experienced very vague instances of prophetic dreaming, which I find just compelling enough to allow me to believe there might be such a thing, though I also have normal, meaningless dreams. |
|
I agree. The only difference I have in my view is that OBEs and NDEs are real. So I have to believe in their existence as far as experiences goes. I just think that aren't the same "type" of experiences as what their names imply. Like you, I think that they are merely hallucinogenic, dream-like experiences misinterpreted and misunderstood. |
|
Yes, I was gonna point that out. They ARE real. Penn and Teller were sort of proving it in there video actually. They were also saying, like you, that they are just hallucinations. I don't think NDEs or OOBEs prove or disprove anything spiritual at all. They probably are just dreams or hallucinations, but that doesn't mean anything. |
|
|
|
Last edited by Kromoh; 08-05-2007 at 03:40 AM.
Saying quantum physics explains cognitive processes is just like saying geology explains jurisprudence.
Reviewing the video, I would say my main problem with it [aside from them being smug dicks] is that it really seems like they are being hypocritical, not just about the "out to make a buck" thing, but in that they seem to see the information gathered as proof against an afterlife, while they are complaining that people see it as proof that there is. Like Dr. Moody says, that believers and nonbelievers are the same. It doesn't prove anything one way or another. Science cannot touch spirituality or at least cannot yet touch it. The tangeable, physiological brain versus the abstract and in this case specifically spiritual goings-on in the mind. |
|
Last edited by jamous; 08-05-2007 at 06:17 AM.
I think he means that the nonbelievers use science, while the believers don't |
|
Saying quantum physics explains cognitive processes is just like saying geology explains jurisprudence.
Hallucinations yes, but could be a preview of whatever the afterlife is. If it wasn't a hallucination you're dead for good. Because you dont die forever you get a glimpse of what is ahead of you in a form of hallucination but not a science term which would be fake images. |
|
Kromoh: I agree with you on a lot of points with a few exceptions. |
|
Tips For Newbies | What to do in an LD
Unless otherwise stated, views expressed in this post are not necessarily representative of the official Dream Views stance. Hell, it's probably not even representative of me.
Lol. I don't base my views on what scientists think, but on what scientifical evidence there is for them. Lucid dreaming si often associated with all that new age stuff, but the concept of it is actually quite possible - counsciousness when one's dreaming. Yes, I'd not immediately believe it if there was no scientifical backing to it, and that's the point of having an argument in my opinion. |
|
Saying quantum physics explains cognitive processes is just like saying geology explains jurisprudence.
Ah, fair enough. You're more cynical about things that aren't easily conceivable as possibilities, hence your attitude about OOBE and God -> Occam's razor and all that. |
|
Tips For Newbies | What to do in an LD
Unless otherwise stated, views expressed in this post are not necessarily representative of the official Dream Views stance. Hell, it's probably not even representative of me.
Ha! You can't prove God wrong or right. It's something called faith. It's the way God meant it to be. Humans will never know for sure if there is or isn't a God. There is no way to prove it. Now, I know there is a God, but it's not because it's been proven. It's because I have faith. |
|
Holy resurrecting threads from yesteryear. |
|
Bookmarks