Thread: Pyrokinesis: Possible or impossible?

Originally Posted by Hukif

Tell that to LucidJuggalo, because my example was for sure not a paradox, it is a possible event in this universe not everywhere, so the "it being impossible" doesn't really apply to it. That is, if we follow the logic of "nothing is impossible".

Well you see... According to quantum physics everything is happening all the time, and the only way that is possible is if there are multiple universes. A multiverse, if you will. Meaning everything is possible because there is a universe for everything. (I think our goal should be learning to 'slide' from universe to universe.)

It's the only way everything is possible. (Which it is.) Though the results of the hadron collider has yet to be published, so it can't be proven (yet.)

Originally Posted by Will1

Well you see... According to quantum physics everything is happening all the time, and the only way that is possible is if there are multiple universes. A multiverse, if you will. Meaning everything is possible because there is a universe for everything. (I think our goal should be learning to 'slide' from universe to universe.)

It's the only way everything is possible. (Which it is.) Though the results of the hadron collider has yet to be published, so it can't be proven (yet.)

Except that's not what quantum physics says. Let's be honest, we both know you have no idea about quantum physics. Stop pretending you do?

Originally Posted by Xei

Except that's not what quantum physics says. Let's be honest, we both know you have no idea about quantum physics. Stop pretending you do?

Let's be even more honest. NO ONE on this forum -really- understands quantum physics. A very small population really understands quantum physics to the degree needed to do anything highly applicable with it.

Obviously.

Originally Posted by Artelis

Let's be even more honest. NO ONE on this forum -really- understands quantum physics. A very small population really understands quantum physics to the degree needed to do anything highly applicable with it.

Obviously.

I agree this this guy. (I don't do the equations, but I sure can put together the theories.)

Originally Posted by Will1

If I could internet choke you, I would. Right now.

Originally Posted by JussiKala

Open mindedness is NOT the same as blindy accepting dumb fairy tales without any proof.

Will, if you would stop saying that there is proof and provide some, please. Thank you. YOU have the burden of proof, since YOU are the one making the positive claim.

The ancient sivilizations knew nothing compared to us. Sure, they might've realized the basic movements of planets and such, but they sure as heck didn't know what the starts were made of, how long they had been there, how they came there, and why they were even visible.

Can't replicate a pyramid? Who would invest the resources into making such a useless journey. Sure, it'd be interesting, but nobody is really trying to do it that seriously.

Science is needed to compile the theory. Before that, it's a hypothesis. If it is not more possible than other insane hypothesises, it's as useless as any rambling of an insane man.

Originally Posted by LucidJuggalo

Jussi, it's ignorance like yours which causes wars, I'm afraid.

Originally Posted by Xei

This is the bit where the train crashes and explodes.

Originally Posted by LucidJuggalo

That basically means: I know you're right, and I'm too up my own ass to acknowledge that, so I'm just going to throw in whatever provokes you because my immaturity levels are blooming.


Take yourself out of this thread, like you clearly stated you were going to do earlier, unless you can actually respond with something worthwhile.

Originally Posted by Will1

Did you just say quantum physics isn't related to telekinesis? I would laugh so hard right now if I could do it through my keyboard.

Perhaps you should watch the video.

Originally Posted by Will1

ancient-wisdom.co.uk/egyptastronomy.htm

If you knew about quantum physics, you wouldn't have said telekinesis isn't possible. Thanks.

Originally Posted by Will1

Well you see... According to quantum physics everything is happening all the time, and the only way that is possible is if there are multiple universes. A multiverse, if you will. Meaning everything is possible because there is a universe for everything. (I think our goal should be learning to 'slide' from universe to universe.)

It's the only way everything is possible. (Which it is.) Though the results of the hadron collider has yet to be published, so it can't be proven (yet.)

Originally Posted by Artelis

Start retarded thread, get retarded answers.

Duh.

Originally Posted by Will1

It was Dr. Michio Kaku's parallel universe theory, who is practically this generations Einstein.
I've been studying it for 4 years, and so far you made yourself look stupid so I'd advise stop putting yourself in that position.

Lets be honest, we both know your not smart, stop pretending you are?

Lol this thread.

@Will1

And god dammit the contraction is YOU'RE. You Are. Okay?

If you honestly expect anyone on this forum to believe you have studied anything for four years you're only kidding yourself. Touting false credentials on the internet is an even faster way to to not be taken seriously than posting bougs threads about psychokinesis.

Originally Posted by Will1

I agree this this guy. (I don't do the equations, but I sure can put together the theories.)

you're still more retarded than Xei in every way.

Originally Posted by Xei

Except that's not what quantum physics says. Let's be honest, we both know you have no idea about quantum physics. Stop pretending you do?

It was Dr. Michio Kaku's parallel universe theory, who is practically this generations Einstein.
I've been studying it for 4 years, and so far you made yourself look stupid so I'd advise stop putting yourself in that position.

Lets be honest, we both know your not smart, stop pretending you are?

OH: But if its not what Quantum Physics says, what does it say, mr. I know so much about quantum physics and I like to cut into the middle and jump out when its convenient in an argument?

Originally Posted by Will1

It was Dr. Michio Kaku's parallel universe theory, who is practically this generations Einstein.
I've been studying it for 4 years, and so far you made yourself look stupid so I'd advise stop putting yourself in that position.

Lets be honest, we both know your not smart, stop pretending you are?

Well I got into the same university as Dirac, Maxwell and Newton. Where do you study?

Michio is a science populariser. The multiple universes interpretation is in the realm of philosophy, not science; he did not come up with the idea; and there are other interpretations including the Copenhagen interpretation which is the one accepted by most physicists.

Four years studying and you didn't know the basic facts? Ouch.

Originally Posted by Artelis

Let's be even more honest. NO ONE on this forum -really- understands quantum physics. A very small population really understands quantum physics to the degree needed to do anything highly applicable with it.

Obviously.

I at least know enough to know when somebody is talking bollocks. I know quite a bit of the qualitative stuff and I can also do some of the mathematics which came up in my course. You're right though that most of it is way beyond any of us. I'm not going to go into it professionally.