 Originally Posted by Lang
Or we don't even know that everyone can lucid dream. I mean one can only hope that everyone is able to do it with some work but, there are those other factors that may make it harder.
Yeah. I heard LaBerge and some members of this forum saying that everyone they know who sticks with it seems to be able to do it in the end. But it did occur to me that it might be the case that people who just can't do it don't stick to it, and only those people who make some progress do. Bit hard to tell unless you made it a compulsory part of the educational system curricula. It could be a self-selection bias.
I'm getting a bit more relaxed about my goals. I would love to be able to do some of the stuff Robert Waggoner talks about, but ... I'll accept what comes. I'm quite happy to spend a couple of months just noting dreams, keeping a journal, improving recall. I'm also continuing to read LaBerge, with a few other books on my list, just to stay intrigued with the idea of lucidity. And when I'm happier with my recall, I'll start doing some of the exercise LaBerge mentions.
Even though he phrases it all in very nice, rational, scientific terms, some of the exercises he mentions are pure occult, they could have come directly from Gurdjieff, Ouspensky or Crowley. I thought that when I read his exercise of doing a lucidity check every time you hear a dog bark, touch money, see a traffic light and so on. All those guys were into that sort of stuff, as a way of constantly being alert and aware of what you are doing and what's going on around you, even when you are involved in other things. It sounds extraordinarily difficult to me!
Well, we've drifted from my question about the SmartWatch. But I'm not so interested now anyway. I think I might have been hoping for a short cut, and I think I've decided there aren't any.
|
|
Bookmarks