Forgive me if I'm late, I have a few things to talk about.
I don't understand how those diagrams are relevant. Can you please explain them?
And Solskye, I can't believe you haven't expanded on your philosophy from your viewpoint. I mean, tell us about how you believe. What's it like everyday in your life? Do you think I am you? What do you think of your parents? How does this increase emotion?
I’m not trying to be difficult here, but: If I understand correctly, every other human being, and anything else in existence is perceived as you, right? So why is it that you can only control your own body and mind? And how can you be taught and learn from people, if you are the only one?
Originally Posted by SolSkye
The less people know, the happier they are, and the more they want to know...
The converse: The more people know, the less happy they are, and the less they want to know...
Haha, yeah. When I was a young kid, everything made sense.
Sometimes it’s “The more people know, the more they want to know…”
Originally Posted by SolSkye
Currently, on the whole, we have become sheep that have been bred to idolize material goods and superficiality. We look up to supermodels, and superstars as these important beings and in turn see ourselves as lesser beings, be it consciously or subconsciously. Most of us get caught up in all the trivial meaningless distractions of life, and try to do anything to keep from looking inwards; TV, shopping, and other mindless distractions at all times of the day. All there to keep you from looking inward. We are told to go to school, so we can get a job, in order to buy useless things we have been told we need. None of those things matter. As an interconnected unit, we have ignored ourselves far too long now. As a result, global population has spiraled out of control, we are at the brink of destroying our planet, and expending resources at a faster rate than we can replenish them without a care in the world. Why is that? In essence, if you ignore yourself, you ignore the environment around you... Other animals understand things more than we give them credit for.
So if you have believed that YOU are everything, why hasn’t your world changed for the better? Is that what you mean?
Originally Posted by jedimind
If it depresses you to know the true nature of reality then you don't truly understand.
We would be lucky if anyone understands true nature of reality. Not even scientists know.
Originally Posted by Merlock
Oh, for blazes sake. If you all don't see the meaning of life in the concept of society then what are you still doing alive?
Suicide => enter a new life => realise it's "meaningless" => repeat.
Case in point, you live and you have those you care for, to any extent. Without anyone at all to the slightest degree special to you there would indeed be absolutely no point to life even from the subjective point of view (sadness/depression due to loneliness, etc.). Don't understimate the concept of other beings in existence, it's really quite insulting.
I feel for you to some point, however, you can’t tell someone to have a certain meaning of life. Ones meaning of life is based on the morals, culture and the attitude of the individual. Don’t take it personally what Solskye’s views are either.
I used to think of life in terms of the latest coverage from science. Despite the point of this thread, science says we are chemical bodies; we are chemical reactions. But then, so what about science? Science doesn’t really prove anything, does it? People can’t say, “Oh I don’t believe in religion, I believe in science” it’s just stupid. Think about it. Are we alive? Then why? Going back, surely the beginning of everything, known as the “Big Bang” can’t just ‘bang’ when there is nothing to begin with. So there is no point in existing? That’s where religion overrules science. Being human, it just feels wrong, for everything to exist because of an accident, because of nothing, because of no one. Even if our conscience might be an illusion, the point remains the same. That’s where Solskye’s philosophy comes in. It is the most interesting and most reasonable to date (for me), if I’m understanding it properly.
|
|
Bookmarks