I see what you're saying - but to achieve that would require complete enlightenment plus complete scientific knowledge. Can anyone ever do that? |
|
Well you can't just roll it up into a ball, it doesn't work like that. The gestalt is not the sum of all parts mashed together, it's the sum of all parts. The aggregate of POV is what truth is, if ever we had the slimmest chance of understanding what truth is. Any other definition of truth, in my opinion, is just POV. |
|
Everything works out in the end, sometimes even badly.
I see what you're saying - but to achieve that would require complete enlightenment plus complete scientific knowledge. Can anyone ever do that? |
|
I think that if such a thing as a universal consciousness exists, that is the only thing to which truth is not a mystery. |
|
Everything works out in the end, sometimes even badly.
This Truth of which you speak sounds rather lofty and abstract, and pretty much unnecessary. If we've got this far without ever seeing a hint of it, then do we need it? It also sounds like something we'll never see. |
|
Truth is supposed to mean what's true right? I bring this point up to remind you that Gravity is not true. You can't prove a hammer will fall before it falls. After it falls, you can use gravity to explain how it fell but therein lies the key difference. Before and After. Truth and Narrative. Nothing is true until you can prove its true and even then you only prove that one particular instance from that one particular POV. Reminding me of my "How can spirituality be studied scientifically?" thread, this goes back to casinos. |
|
Last edited by Omnis Dei; 12-01-2011 at 01:45 AM.
Everything works out in the end, sometimes even badly.
Truth does not rely on proof - only our understanding of it does. Truth is truth whether or not we know what it is. |
|
I don't know, I think its valuable to remember that absolute truth is outside the realm of man and man is left only to work the figures and make decisions, not to discern truth. |
|
Everything works out in the end, sometimes even badly.
Darkmatter, |
|
Last edited by lidybug; 12-01-2011 at 05:10 AM.
What are you doing in my head??!!! |
|
Last edited by Darkmatters; 12-01-2011 at 05:35 AM.
Well I believe it's only beyond Cognitive Comprehension but that we have greater awareness in us than our cognition which is tapped into this aggregate perception. |
|
Last edited by Omnis Dei; 12-01-2011 at 07:35 AM.
Everything works out in the end, sometimes even badly.
Ontological pursuits actually got us past the elephant metaphor of reality, though unfortunately, those who have failed to follow, typically assume something is because of a similar property - assuming the consequent type reasoning. |
|
I stomp on your ideas.
I disagree. The purpose of a small piece can only be understood by observing the larger mechanism. We can use ontological study to discover things like what the piece is made up and what physical properties can be attributed with it but we cannot see a forest by looking at a tree. We can postulate a forest but I've seen all sorts of wise postulations coming from people who cannot grasp the concept with their minds. Regurgitating knowledge is not the same as perceiving an object and ontological study has served more as a means to list judgments about things which end up fogging our perception rather than clarifying it. |
|
Everything works out in the end, sometimes even badly.
You've missed the part where you explain what that is -_- |
|
Everything works out in the end, sometimes even badly.
I was going to read this entire thread but got bored half-way through. |
|
Dianeve did you read my meditation (reply #58)? This is the source of my thoughts for this post. That might clear your thoughts a little further and maybe it won't. I have not changed my mind on this subject, but I do respect and appreciate all perspectives. I only ask that before making a comment as you did above that you read the entire post. |
|
Last edited by lidybug; 12-08-2011 at 05:20 AM.
Here is another meditation that brought me back to my thoughts of... everything is. |
|
I do like the way you think!! |
|
Saying I like the way someone thinks does not mean I believe the same things they do... |
|
Is that a fact? |
|
I think that thruth is whatever works. This means that the thruth is relative to whatever you are doing. If something does not work in a given task, it is not the truth and you should try something else. But I dont believe that all things have meaning by themselves. Meaning is where you put it. You can make any event meaningful, but you dont have to. Sometimes it's good not to make things matter so much... You'll be searching for deep hidden meaning in coca cola soon when you could just take it as it is, something to drink. Better to make some things matter more than others I think. |
|
I am all I am nothing. I am the door opener and the door closer.
You are dreaming....
Bookmarks