Why dream experience is fundamental and so very important

[FrankDiMeglio]

Fundamentally proven inertial and gravitational equivalency: Why we necessarily exist in, and have extension of experience in, the middle distance in/of space. HUGE NEWS !!! ================================================== ================== The following post is written by Author Frank DiMeglio. My full name is Frank Martin DiMeglio. The same writings/contents are also written at the Author Frank DiMeglio Publisher Page, so you know that this is me gab (Tech Administrator). Care to explain what is wrong with the following gab? Do you really think that this is not Author Frank DiMeglio gab, really? gab, what are you doing; and why? ========================== Together, on balance, the top of the VISIBLE head/body and the adjoining INVISIBLE space there constitute a MIDDLE distance in/of space. The VISIBLE space (of the Earth/ground) to the INVISIBLE space at the very top of the visible body/head also constitutes a middle distance in/of space. Fundamentally and most importantly, invisible and visible space in FUNDAMENTAL equilibrium and balance necessarilly consitutes a MIDDLE distance in/of space consistent with BOTH half gravity and half inertia. Very importantly, while standing upright in our waking experience, FULL GRAVITY involves FULL DISTANCE in/of space as it is seen, felt, AND touched. Consider the VISIBLE Earth/ground. (Consider the range of touch/feeling.) Now, most importantly, the space above the VISIBLE Earth/ground involves visible AND invisible space in FUNDAMENTAL equilibrium and balance. Accordingly, this invisible space IS middle distance in/of space consistent with half gravity AND half inertia. Full distance in/of space is in fundamental and natural equilibrium and balance with middle distance in/of space. The invisible space that we live in exists BETWEEN outer space (full inertia) and the VISIBLE ground/Earth (full gravity). This invisible space is necessarily different from both outer space and the visible Earth/ground. This middle distance in/of space does necessarily involve visible AND invisible space in FUNDAMENTAL equilibrium and balance consistent with what IS middle distance in/of space (along with half gravity and half inertia AS WELL). VISION begins INVISIBLY inside the eye/body. This fundamental visual experience of the invisible eye/space IS the fundamental experience of the body as well. Notice the invisible space at the top of the head/body while waking and standing. The invisible middle distance in/of space is where weight and the feeling of gravity begin. There is weightlessness in outer space, and the Earth/ground involves FULL weight and FULL gravity. The direct/real/true/actual experience of outer space AS IT IS destroys and precludes us, our thought, and all of our experience (including visual). The space is black, there is weightlessness, and we are not touching anything. Think about it. It ALL makes sense. Outer space is FULL INERTIA. We necessarily exist in the MIDDLE distance in/of space. Here I have established inertial and gravitational equivalency and balancing in the most fundamental and extensive fashion that is possible. by Author Frank DiMeglio I have fundamentally and ultimately explained inertial and gravitational equivalency and balancing in conjunction with the fundamental explanation and description of/involving both visible and invisible space. ================================================== ================= DEFINITIVE PROOF OF THE FUNDAMENTAL AND ULTIMATE UNIFICATION AND BALANCING OF INERTIA AND GRAVITY Dreams balance being AND experience and demonstrate the fundamental and ultimate equivalency and balancing of gravity, inertia, and electromagnetism. This involves half gravity and half inertia, as visible and invisible space in fundamental equilbrium and balance IS the experience of the middle distance in/of space (including seen, felt, AND touched). This space is semi-detached from touch consistent with the experience of the middle distance in/of space and half gravity and half inertia. Importantly, VISION begins INVISIBLY inside the eye/body. Now, I have successfully applied this to waking experience as follows. While standing upright in our waking experience, FULL GRAVITY is FULL DISTANCE in/of space as it is seen, felt, AND touched. (Consider the range of feeling/touch.) Now, consider the VISIBLE Earth/ground, as space is not detached from touch. This space can be equivalently understood as the invisible space above the Earth/ground as follows. Visible AND invisible space in FUNDAMENTAL equilibrium and balance IS a MIDDLE distance in/of space consistent with half inertia and half gravity. Indeed, this space is BETWEEN the VISIBLE ground/Earth and outer space. Outer space involves FULL INERTIA; as the direct/true/real experience of outer space AS IT IS destroys and precludes us, our thought, and our experience (including visual). This space is fully detached from touch, there is weightlessness, and the space is black. It all makes sense. We are not touching anything, and outer space cannot be touched at all. ================================= Notice how the VISIBLE waking experience IS comparatively INVISIBLE in relation to what is dream experience. VERY IMPORTANT. Vision begins invisibly inside the eye/body. Full distance in/of space is in fundamental and natural equilibrium and balance with middle distance in/of space. ================================= Dream experience is separate from, and yet it is also fundamentally and undeniably linked with, waking experience. Dreams involve an essential and fundamental mastery of physics and physical experience. Importantly, vision begins invisibly inside the eye/body. Invisible and visible space in fundamental equilibrium and balance in dreams is consistent with the experience of the middle distance in/of space (including seen and felt/touched) in conjunction with quantum gravity and fundamentally equivalent and balanced gravity, electromagnetism, and inertia. Dreams necessarily involve half gravity and half inertia in conjunction with fundamentally equivalent and balanced gravity, inertia, and electromagnetism. Therefore, dream experience is that of the middle distance in/of space in keeping with fundamentally balanced and middle strength feeling/touch/force/energy. Accordingly, the maximum of balanced force/energy/feeling/touch in dreams is half in comparison with the feeling/touch that is experienced at the feet (at what is also the visible Earth/ground) while waking and standing. Comparatively, we are talking about a range of feeling/touch; as full gravity is full distance in/of space as it is seen, felt, and touched. Notice the fundamentally balanced half or middle strength gravity, inertia, and electromagnetism in dreams that necessarily involves the middle distance in/of space (including half gravity and half inertia of necessity). It is a great truth/fact that the self represents, forms, and experiences a comprehensive approximation of experience in general by combining conscious and unconscious experience. Dream experience is consistent with the most fundamental and great truth/fact that the self represents, forms, and experiences a comprehensive approximation of experience in general by combining conscious and unconscious experience. Indeed, if the self did not represent, form, and experience a comprehensive approximation of experience in general by combining conscious and unconscious experience, we would then be incapable of growth and of becoming other than we are. There is no outsmarting the genius of dreams. ================================================== ======= Fundamentally and most importantly, invisible and visible space in FUNDAMENTAL equilibrium and balance necessarily consitutes a MIDDLE distance in/of space consistent with BOTH half gravity and half inertia. This statement applies perfectly, consistently, and entirely to dream experience as well. I have proven this. By Author Frank DiMeglio

[FrankDiMeglio]

Dreams make thought more like sensory experience in general, thereby improving upon memory and understanding. Also, the ability of thought to describe or reconfigure sensory experience is ultimately dependent upon the extent to which thought is similar to sensory experience. Accordingly, not only do dreams make us smarter, but they can be fundamentally understood. Indeed, there is no outsmarting the genius of dreams. Comments and questions are quite welcome please. This is a very important thread/discussion. Thanks!

[FrankDiMeglio]

Administrator and Moderators, what exactly do you think of this please? gab (Tech Administrator), where is your reply please? This is a very important thread/discussion. That is quite clear.

[FrankDiMeglio]

Ultimately, gravity involves intelligible, finite, and perceptible distance in/of space. Dream physics matters alot: Why television takes the real/actual physical form that it does: Dream experience grows/increases. Dreams definitely involve inertia and gravity in fundamental equivalency and balance (half inertia and half gravity, and middle distance in/of space accordingly). Dream experience is semi-detached from touch. Dreams make thought more like sensory experience in general. Television is a creation of thought that is fully similar to (or fully like) thought. Television is fully detached from touch; it is full electromagnetism, and the distance in/of space is eliminated/flattened. Notice the comparison with the visible ground/Earth (full distance in/of space and full gravity). Dream experience is that of the middle distance in/of space. Compare this/the middle distance in/of space in relation to: 1) Television (full electromagnetism and full inertia). Television is an unnatural experience that is fully detached from touch. Distance in/of space is eliminated/flattened. 2) The visible ground/Earth (i.e., full distance in/of space and full gravity). I am still waiting for the full and complete official evaluation of all of this by the Administrator of this site and gab.

[FrankDiMeglio]

Dreams balance being and experience. Dream experience is possible/potential and actual. It involves visible and invisible space in fundamental equilibrium and balance consistent with the experience of the middle distance in/of space and half gravity and half inertia. The body is visible and invisible in dreams. Seen and felt/touched, dream experience is that of the middle distance in/of space. Think about it. Inertia and gravity in relation to our fundamental experience of space: When waking and standing, full gravity is full distance in/of space as it is seen, felt, and touched. (Consider the range of feeling/touch.) Now consider the visible Earth/ground. Now, the space above it involves visible and invisible space in fundamental equilibrium and balance. This is the middle distance in/of space, and it is half gravity and half inertia. Outer space is full inertia. The direct/real/actual experience of outer space as it is eliminates and precludes our experience and thought. It is important that vision begins invisibly inside the eye/body. While standing upright, the eye may be placed at the very top of the visible head/body, and this invisible space may be extended downward. Visible and invisible space in fundamental equilibrium and balance IS the middle distance in/of space, and it is half gravity and half inertia. That is most important and fundamental. The body is visible and invisible. Full inertia and full electromagnetism (in the absence of our natural experience of gravity, that is) can be represented by both television and outer space. Here we have the detachment, elimination/flattening, and removal of these spaces in relation to touch/tactile experience. The Earth/ground is semi-detached in relation to touch. It is a different/detached space, and yet it is also touched. The invisible experience of the eye is detached in relation to touching the visible Earth/ground, and the visible body is touching the visible ground/Earth. The space at the very top of the visible head/body is also invisible. Fundamental inertial and gravitational equilibrium and balance is required for our experience and for the extension of stabilized distance in/of space. To understand experience, space, and physics properly, consistently, fully, and fundamentally, we need to examine touch, feeling, and visual experience fundamentally. Our fundamental experience of space involves visible and invisible space in fundamental equilibrium and balance consistent with the experience of the middle distance in/of space, the semi-detachment of touch/tactile experience, and half gravity and half inertia. The [invisible] experience of the eye is semi-detached in relation to touch/tactile experience. Think about it. Full distance in/of space is in natural equilibrium and balance with middle distance in/of space.

[FrankDiMeglio]

gab and Administrator, your reply to all of what is in this thread please???

[gab]

Sorry, Frank. Unfortunatelly, I'm not smart enough to understand this. Hence, I can not give you my opinion on your ideas.

[Sageous]

Will you be willing to hear opinions and questions from someone other than an administrator or moderator, Frank? I hope so! If so, here's one that I think was asked before, on other threads: Given that all space is invisible, from the vast stretches of intergalactic emptiness to the tiny gap between your extended forefinger and thumb, and given that gravity is a force with an infinite number of potential levels rendering "half gravity" impossible, are visible/invisible space and half-gravity just metaphors, or perhaps experiential references? Also: Dreams make thought more like sensory experience in general, thereby improving upon memory and understanding. Also, the ability of thought to describe or reconfigure sensory experience is ultimately dependent upon the extent to which thought is similar to sensory experience. Accordingly, not only do dreams make us smarter, but they can be fundamentally understood. Indeed, there is no outsmarting the genius of dreams. I'm not sure I understand this, but it does remind me of things I've written about thought energy -- the unique, non-electromagnetic force that may be created by every conscious thought -- and the concept that lucid dreaming may be the only vehicle for witnessing the very formation of that thought energy. Witnessing the creation of thought energy would indeed reconfigure the sensory experience, I think. Also, as long as I'm here, I agree also that being lucid does indeed open a door to a better, perhaps direct, understanding of our unconscious and its inner workings. There is a grain of genius in that, I suppose. Or were you saying that dreaming in general bears that genius, thanks to such witnessing? I suppose that may be tue as well, but, given that our true "self" is not present in a non-lucid dream, is there really any witnessing of unconscious activity going on? Comments and questions are quite welcome please. This is a very important thread/discussion. Thanks! Now that you seem to be actually with us (or with Gab, at least), I truly hope that your answers arrive as direct responses to our questions and not as the cut-and-pastes of posts you've already provided to date... please work with us Frank, we would like to decipher what it is you are teaching us.

[FrankDiMeglio]

Hi Sageous. Thanks for your interest and questions. I just answered alot of what you are asking, and much of what is fundamental and important here, under Extended Discussion, under Science & Mathematics....The cosmological redshift necessarily relates to how these observations are possible. Dreams combine, balance, and include opposites. The ultimate understanding of physics combines, balances, and includes opposites. Dreams make thought more like sensory experience in general, thereby improving upon memory and understanding. Also, the ability of thought to describe or reconfigure sensory experience is ultimately dependent upon the extent to which thought is similar to sensory experience. Accordingly, not only do dreams make us smarter, but they can be fundamentally understood. Indeed, there is no outsmarting the genius of dreams. Television is fully like thought consistent with the fact that TV is a creation of thought. Dream experience is not a creation of thought. Dream experience is emotional, theoretical/thoughtful, sensory, and (importantly) possible/potential and actual experience. Dream experience is quantum gravity. Full gravity is full distance in/of space (seen, felt, and touched). Dream experience is that of the middle distance in/of space consistent with half gravity and half inertia, middle strength force/energy/feeling/touch, invisible and visible space in fundamental equilibrium and balance, and invisible space (relative to visible). Notice that the semi-spherical (blue dome) shape/form of the invisible space is a middle distance relative to the full gravity of the visible Earth/ground. (The Earth is basically fully spherical.) Television eliminates/flattens [natural] reality, is electromagnetism, is fully detached from touch, and the distance in/of space is eliminated. The Earth/ground is visible and is not detached in relation to touch. Dream experience is semi-detached in relation to touch. See how all of this goes together? Also, please see the other thread that I mentioned. Thanks. The concepts of half inertia and half gravity are clearly proven here and in the other thread. What we have here is a central and fundamental breakthrough and advancement in physics and physical understanding. All of what I have said at this Forum needs to be considered together in its totality for the proper and full comprehension of these ideas. Thanks. Questions and comments are very welcome.

[Sageous]

^^ Respectfully, Frank, you really ought to actually answer our questions, rather than simply cutting and pasting things you posted earlier. No, the concepts of half-inertia and half gravity are not proven here, or in the other thread (or in any of the others). Neither was the concept of visible and invisible space (all space is invisible, because by definition space is nothing, and it is the objects occupying it that are visible). Simply announcing that something is proven, or repeating the words you already used, does not qualify as proof, I'm afraid. You do understand that the force of earth's gravity is exactly the same when in orbit as it is on the ground, right? And that if you were not moving at substantial velocity around it, you would fall to earth with the same certainty and acceleration that you would if falling off a simple cliff? Plus, gravity and inertia, being forces of infinite value, do not have a "half." Are you speaking only of gravity relative to earth, and not the rest of the cosmos? If so, that seems quite limiting, cosmologically speaking. Are you simply saying that the equilibrium of inertia (that orbit velocity) and gravity causes a balance that is effectively half-gravity and half-inertia? If so, that is hardly earth-shattering news, I'm afraid. I've asked before, and ask again now: are you speaking metaphorically, equating your half-gravity/half-inertia to the special equilibrium of reality perception that dreaming allows? Or, do you really believe that there are laws of physics that back your statements, laws that haven't yet been qualified? If you are waxing metaphoric, could you please explain those metaphors for us -- without cutting and pasting anything previously said? Again, I ask these questions with all due respect, Frank, and I wish you would return that respect by responding with thoughtful answers rather than reprints of previous posts. I want to believe that you are on to something, and that you are not just another guy walking around in a sort of cyber-sandwichboard. Please work with us, Frank, or we will never understand your message.

[dave36333]

I've asked before, and ask again now: are you speaking metaphorically, equating your half-gravity/half-inertia to the special equilibrium of reality perception that dreaming allows? Or, do you really believe that there are laws of physics that back your statements, laws that haven't yet been qualified? If you are waxing metaphoric, could you please explain those metaphors for us -- without cutting and pasting anything previously said? After seeing so many posts from Frank and by other means of some sort of one way conversation, Frank will agree that he deserves the Nobel Peace Prize in Physics because all Physicists are stupid and he is the only one that understands. You will all agree with him once he wins the Nobel peace prize. He Truely and Fundamentally believes this. Frank believes , in his head, that saying something like "clearly" means proof of his theories. Sadly, none of his axioms are valid in the real world but only in his head.

[Dthoughts]

Sadly, none of his axioms are valid in the real world but only in his head. So then, does this imply that his, mine or your head is not a part of the real world?

[dave36333]

So then, does this imply that his, mine or your head is not a part of the real world? DThoughts. Here in the USA we use Mind and Head Interchangeably unlike you Russians.

[Sibyline]

DThoughts. Here in the USA we use Mind and Head Interchangeably unlike you Russians. *looks at Dthought's Dutch flag*

[FrankDiMeglio]

What I am presenting here is clear. Quantum gravity is present in dreams consistent with invisible and visible space in fundamental equilbrium and balance, the middle distance in/of space, and inertia and gravity in fundamental equilibrium and balance (this necessarily means half gravity and half inertia). Dreams involve fundamentally equivalent and balanced inertia, gravity, and electromagnetism. Importantly, vision begins invisibly inside the eye/body. The reduction in gravity is balanced with a proportionate increase in inertia in dreams. Dreams involve fundamentally balanced and equivalent electromagnetic/gravitational/inertial force/energy/feeling/touch. The proportionate reduction of thought and the range and extensiveness of feeling is consistent with the gravitational, electromagnetic, and inertial equivalency and balancing. Logically and fundamentally, invisible and visible space in fundamental equilbrium and balance IS the middle distance in/of space. This involves half gravity and half inertia of necessity. Balance involves the center. Importantly, balance and completeness (and extensiveness) go hand-in-hand. Dreams involve balanced and equivalent attraction and repulsion, as the space is both flattened/contracted and stretched/expanded in a balanced fashion. Quantum gravity depends upon inertial and gravitational equivalency and balancing in keeping with space that is made equally larger and smaller in keeping therewith. This allows for fundamental and stabilized [middle] distance in/of space.

[Sageous]

^^ Okay then; cut-n-paste it is! Since you must be well aware by now that we either do not understand or have serious questions about your proclamations, yet you choose to simply keep repeating those proclamations, it is obvious to me that you have no interest in communicating with us. This could be because you don't really care what we little people understand, you have no explanations, you are a "Frankbot" or a publisher's intern mindlessly spammin' the net with your work, or, perhaps, Dave is right. In any case, I'll give up trying to reach you or understand you, and I recommend that others here should choose the same. After all, in all these threads you've written absolutely nothing new or even different from your very first post, you refuse to answer our questions or offer clarifications, and you just barely acknowledge that this is a forum and not a personal blog site; why should we bother with you, Frank? Still, if you ever find yourself able to say something new (or at least rephrased), without all the caps, slashes, bold, and hyperbole, I will read your words with interest. Until then, you are not worth my time at least, and probably not worth anyone at DV's time. It's a shame, really... somewhere in all that noise you're shouting might be wisdom that matters; I suppose we will never know. Take care, Frank... seriously

[gab]

^^ Okay then; cut-n-paste it is! Since you must be well aware by now that we either do not understand or have serious questions about your proclamations, yet you choose to simply keep repeating those proclamations, it is obvious to me that you have no interest in communicating with us. This could be because you don't really care what we little people understand, you have no explanations, you are a "Frankbot" or a publisher's intern mindlessly spammin' the net with your work, or, perhaps, Dave is right. In any case, I'll give up trying to reach you or understand you, and I recommend that others here should choose the same. After all, in all these threads you've written absolutely nothing new or even different from your very first post, you refuse to answer our questions or offer clarifications, and you just barely acknowledge that this is a forum and not a personal blog site; why should we bother with you, Frank? Still, if you ever find yourself able to say something new (or at least rephrased), without all the caps, slashes, bold, and hyperbole, I will read your words with interest. Until then, you are not worth my time at least, and probably not worth anyone at DV's time. It's a shame, really... somewhere in all that noise you're shouting might be wisdom that matters; I suppose we will never know. Take care, Frank... seriously Yes.

[snoop]

There is so much that we do not fundamentally understand that is clearly related to the importance and profound nature of dreaming that involves taste/touch/smell/sight/sounds. The quantum mechanics involved prove that the angular momentum of Frank's arguments are the inverse of those which are profoundly and certainly real within his dreaming and waking mind. It is of the utmost importance that we realize this relationship between the thoughts that occupy ones head and their counterparts in reality. The gravitational pull of such thoughts, which quantum mechanics has clearly illustrated exists, causes its multiplicative inverse within the mind-space (in this case of Frank), creating a massive expansion of the ego. Frank is merely a victim of the reality which he has so clearly come to understand. Aren't we all Frank, aren't we all.

[Dthoughts]

Sageous! I had this nagging thingy in my head. I suppose it is irrelevant in loads of ways but Gravity is not consistend across distance like you seem to imply. The further away you move from the earth the less acceleration you feel when falling towards the earth. I do not understand why you would imply otherwise? Snoop, that was genius!

[Sageous]

^^ Sorry... my physics lessons are far enough behind me that I might have gotten a bit muddled. I remember that, as long as you are within earth's influence, the rate of acceleration toward it is always the same (32 ft per sec per sec, I think), regardless of what you might feel. I guess I remember wrong; perhaps I should've googled it? My bad...But that really doesn't go against my question about half-gravity, I think.

[Original Poster]

I recall gravitational acceleration was taught to me as a constant, too. If you drop a stapler from the top of the Sears Tower, and a basketball from the second floor, their initial speed would be the same. The only thing that could vary it, in my mind, would be the variation of resistance in thinner atmosphere, but I think that only affects how quickly terminal velocity sets in. I don't remember any of this stuff! I will safely say that I've learned one thing, which is that for whatever reason this thread is very important.

[dave36333]

I recall gravitational acceleration was taught to me as a constant, too. If you drop a stapler from the top of the Sears Tower, and a basketball from the second floor, their initial speed would be the same. The only thing that could vary it, in my mind, would be the variation of resistance in thinner atmosphere, but I think that only affects how quickly terminal velocity sets in. I don't remember any of this stuff! I will safely say that I've learned one thing, which is that for whatever reason this thread is very important. sure-- drop a 100 lb weight and a 5 lb weight from your hands at the same distance and they will hit the floor at the same time. Simple physics. I found a recent photo of Frank while he is thinking this stuff up. monkey.jpg

[snoop]

Man I got to thinking, I mean, what's the real question we're all wondering here? What if Frank is actually an established DV member that was only testing our reactions to see how much of the site was willing to go along with a stupid idea that no one could even decipher because it sounds mysterious and like he knows what he's talking about, and he is collecting the data and analyzing the results for a study? Think about it, Frank could be any one of us! Joking aside, I'm thinking Frank is just a troll that combined a lot of the ultra-hypothetical theories from beyond dreaming and is just trying to piss us off. I realize there are people as stupid and fraudulent as Frank presents himself out there in the world, but it's the internet. Pretty much any time something like this comes up, I just assume it's someone trolling. Dreaming is obviously a sensitive topic to this forum and being a psuedo-intellectual is quite commonly bashed here in the extended discussion. It just so happens he tries to put forth conjecture that solves the mystery of dreaming or whatever the hell he was trying to explain, and does so posing as an intellectual that keeps repeating the same esoteric rubbish to prove his points? A little too coincidental for me.

[Original Poster]

Alt accounts are against DVs rules, you'll never get me to admit it.

[Dthoughts]

No, frank actually wrote a book. It has reviews as well ranging from critical to profoundly positive. About gravity constant. It has been taught to me by my teacher at school that gravity has a set value that is widely applied for gravity. Only when you make very precise measurements do you take into account the gravity distance factor when you are further away from the earth. I'm a high school student who dropped out of school. Currently trying to regain lost time in terms of school-life so don't take my word for it. Here's the gravitational map they have made and it seems to confirm what i am saying, correct me if i'm wrong! Because i didn't fully understand and i actually had a different picture in mind. I thought gravity had to do with density of certain parts of the earth. But it seems to be applied to volume rather than density? Err.. I don't know!? Check it out : Gravity map reveals Earth's extremes - physics-math - 19 August 2013 - New Scientist