First off, I'm sorry if you guys feel like I'm attacking you. I have nothing against you, personally. I want to thank you for writing about your experiences for us to read about. You've clearly put a lot of time into this guide, and I think that's great. What I'm trying to do is offer a critique on techniques that are based on these very broad ideas such as "trusting yourself," "not trying," etc. (I labeled them "anti-techniques.") I think it's good to say "be confident in your ability and don't give up" when it's supplement to an actual technique. However, I believe it's very silly to say "DON'T TRY AT ALL." This appears to be where we disagree.
For example, you say in your first post:
So here, it's clear that you're advising people not to try to have lucid dreams, and then you go on to say this will help people succeed. This is what I mean when I say, "these anti-techniques lure people into developing bad habits." In other words, I believe "not trying, even a little" is a very bad habit, and you're luring people into doing just this by saying it will help. Of course, we disagree, but I don't see what's wrong with offering my point of view. Is it against the rules on this forum to offer my concerns if they conflict with the thread-maker's own opinion? If so, I'll shut up.
I apologize if I came off as rude. However, judging from your post, I think you may've got the wrong idea of why I was talking about purchasable items and such.
- First I say that things of value take effort.
- SilverBullet counters by saying that some things of value are free by offering examples.
- I counter-counter by saying that, in those examples, the things of values are purchasable items, and not skills. Because you can't purchase a skill, then it can't be given or found freely (as in SilverBullet's examples). Thus, lucid dreaming, a skill, can not be gained for free (unless you're a natural, of course).
- I never intended to make it seem like SilverBullet was selling something. I think you're mixing this up because of the puchasable item analogy.
Also, I think it's important for me to repeat something I said in my first post on this thread. It may very well be that this technique is useful in some sense, but if so, it's because this technique is simply a reimagining of the "autosuggestion" technique found in EWLD.
Bookmarks