 Originally Posted by SilverBullet
You are making it much more complicated that it really is.
Translation: Because others have stated that your philosophy is generic and naive at best, you’re proceeding to sham arguments to sustain your ad hoc claims over “you are or you aren’t.” Nobody is making this complicated, and considering you seem to have over 1,000 lucid dreams under your belt, something like this shouldn’t be overly complicated to fathom in the first place.
Unless of course those lucid dreams were as lackluster as your philosophy for you to conjecture that this discussion is complicated. Or maybe it’s something else entirely.
Words are fun to play with and all, but ultimately they do not help us in the realm of dreams.
This is non-sequential to whatever it is you’re trying to get at here. Who said anything about words and how they relate to comprehending the realm of dreams?
It’s completely understandable that there sometimes can’t be enough words to describe an experience in a dream, and obviously those moments are limited through nonverbal means of conceptualizing them, but what does your statement here have to do with anything?
You might think that experimenting, and testing with all kinds of different techniques is the important part, but it is not. Using your intent is very simple, so in my opinion it is best to keep it that way.
Intent is pretty simple given how there would be psychological predispositions for self-actualization and other human drives, but bringing up this obvious fact is irrelevant in supporting your disposition that experimentation isn’t needed.
It’s only adding on to how you feel that a person not learning how to use retrospect in their previous lucid attempts to formulate ways to improve on that isn’t needed because intent is the dues ex machina everyone needs to solve those menial doubts and simple trial and error?
Maybe you had a bad reading comprehension, or I probably should just use middle school logic here, but I already stated experimentation is one of many aspects to be used in tandem with intent that can be useful.
Infact, experience with methods can make your doubts worse. I was convinced I had the power to lucid dream regardless of anything. I barely had any experience, but when I let go and trusted my power it came to me on it's own.
Experience with methods can make your doubts worse? That’s only if the individual is incapable of using a simple cognitive ability to analyze from those experiences to improve, or it’s just the same unintelligible equivocation you’ve presented throughout this whole thread.
I understand the whole “power comes from within,” but this doesn’t distract the fact that you feel that people would be too incompetent to realize their own mistakes from experiences. This also doesn’t sustain any validity in your OP whatsoever. All it’s really saying is that all attempts for being proficient in techniques to develop skill leads to doubt.
That’s negative front-loading, and is counterproductive in your aim to cause some uplifting overtone for newcomers.
Many people have told me, that they do indeed trust their power, but I can almost immediately tell that what they are saying are still the words of someone who doesn't.
You’re seriously utilizing an imaginative argumentum ad populum to sustain your delusions of grandeur that those people haven’t reached the same pinnacle or paradigm shift required (that you seem to only have) to truly embody those same words?
This only adds to that same unintelligible equivocation you’re constantly avoiding to acknowledge. Because I can easily ask you:
- What do you feel would have that individual capable enough to truly understand the meaning behind those words that you feel they don’t really know to the fullest?
The only pragmatic way for you to actually get yourself out of this is that your same experience with all those thousands of lucid dreams would be necessary in order to understand that intent is king right? And because you’ve presented in your previous post that experiences with other techniques is unnecessary and inconsistent, you’re ultimately providing an impasse logic here. That is why the whole thread in general is futile and only creates those same menial doubts you’re so inclined to believe that garnering experience with techniques and such will lead to.
We play stupid, we ignore the obvious, we tell ourselves lies, and then we try to get others to agree with us to justify it. Then, we feel sorry for ourselves to complete the circle.
Right, confirmation bias along with denial and ending it all up into making detached justifications to see things in a new light. That's something most newcomers may be attached to prevent themselves from giving up. It's good for perseverance, but some people just don't know how to bend that ideology a bit for long-term before they snap completely. Even with that, they would only to come up with a revelation at some point to bring more solace and learning through what they deemed as a failure. You honestly think that just intent magically gives them that realization?
And I’m wondering if you’re aware that what you’re saying (with intent only being needed) would require the individual to get experience with trial and error to reach that realization and to truly have authority to declare those same words you feel they’re not ready to state. But don’t worry about that, since you think no one needs experience with other attributes for developing unconscious competence with knowing when one is dreaming.
Just go with the western philosophies of finding power from within, and suddenly it’s more consistent instead of using that in tandem with actually going through trial and error, and using retrospect to progressively improve is what you’re getting at here.
Since that seems the case, you’re giving pseudo-intellectualism here. But I guess if those of words of pretense is enough to make people feel better, then you're just causing a self-fulfilling prophecy that will backfire on their end. They'll feel like they can actually do it without acknowledging they need to develop experiential learning to sustain that. That's a cognitive dissonance just waiting to happen.
|
|
Bookmarks