>>Why would we ask him what the answer is?<<

Why was everyone PMing the task to everyone else, after I had asked them not to do that?

>>And why is his answer the only one? Isn't it entirely possible for everyone on the forum to find a different answer in their lucid dream?<<

Nobody will get the very same answer, but all will be compatible with the answers Walms got. He got more than one answer.

>>By the way, I've never had a good lucid dream, and I admit it.<<

That's true of most people here, except that they don't admit it.

>>However, I could easily come up with everything you said and challenged us to do.<<

Why don't you just come up with an LD instead?

>>How about you show us your skills, Mr. "LDs don't last long enough for you to give very much of a talk, and they occur too unpredictably."?<<

For someone who admittedly has no skills, that's a lot of taunting for you to be doing, isn't it? I know who Cynthia Gonzalez is and I know what Minarez is. Walms knows what Minarez is, but he doesn't know who Cynthia Gonzalez is. Nobody else here knows anything about either subject.

>>Also, isn't it better for one person to lie, than for one person to accuse everyone who doesn't agree with him of lying?<<

I don't mind disagreement, but I do mind lying. I mind that a lot.

When a young male goes on the Internet, acts like a tough guy, struts around and talks trash about his alleged dreaming prowess, you can bet your last dollar that he's never had an LD. You'll notice that Walms doesn't act that way. That's because he's the real deal.