So I've been trying to pay attention to 'astral' stuff for the last couple of weeks....
In waking life, there is the way that things appear, and there's also what those appearances mean to us. People think in terms of the appearances, but below the surface its really the interpretations that motivate us. And there are multiple depths of memories. There are the pictures, but there are also the meanings that we remember.
In an 'astral' experience, so far as I can tell, the images are generated from the meanings. A smile means something to me, and I generate the appearance of someone smiling from that thought. If I'm 'seeing' anything astrally, I'm doing that subconsciously. The experience seems to originate in the thought, not in an inner or exotic sensate input. But since there's still a connection between the thought and objective waking life experience, I'm not sure what that implies. In other words, I'm restating in another way that there is some kind of 'karma', and this is the same way that astral experience works. But we still don't know how karma works. Shared dreaming would be an aspect of the same kind of thing.
These aren't 'strong' astral experiences I've had lately, but I think its probably the same, even though I'm less wide awake and lucid than I have been in the past. In the 'weak' dream experience my senses are mostly sleeping, or seeing blackness, and my mind's eye takes them over a little bit. In the 'strong' experience, the senses are wide awake, so to speak, but not receiving information, and my mind's eye is driving them full-on. It seems like the two experiences are essentially the same except for that difference.
My point is that I think that the 'meanings' we associate with things should be what we look into more as we try to understand this, that its in the right direction. I had a much better word for this, that came to me in a dream, but it was some kind of psychological jargon, not a word I know in waking life, and I've forgotten it. The meaning is almost like an archetype, but it doesn't have to be as grand and semi-universal. Ever notice how places like expensive hotels put books on shelves to add an air of sophistication, but if you look closer the actual titles are mostly arbitrary? Those books are mostly interchangeable, they represent something. Even when people read real books, to some extent they're doing it because the book represents something, for instance they feel good to be a person who values books. As long as the book is sophisticated enough to plausibly support that experience of being a 'reader of books', if that's the person's motive, it almost doesn't matter what it says. This 'what the book represents' is like the kind of thing I'm trying to get at, which I don't have a word for. Subconsciously we think largely in terms of those deeper meanings. I think if we want to understand our subconscious minds, which is where all this exotic astral, telepathy, and precognition stuff comes from, it will help to get better at thinking about these more abstract types, since this is closer to the part of the mind that can do the paranormal stuff.
For whatever that's worth.
|
|
Bookmarks