Tommo, Castandea /and or/don Juan didn't mean exactly that by heightened awareness - although it's possible to see a schematic link, in his philosophy, between that kind of awareness and ideas like second and third attention; both of which are, fundamentally, un-orthodox perceptual states. Although, it's also clear that don Juan does in fact see surival benefits in heightened awareness - at least for Nauguals. (Although discrepancies in don Juan'sthinking are oft cited as evidence that he was manufactured, I actually think it indicates a much more organic thinker - like a real person,be that Carlos himslef or don Juan - who sees things from multiple perspectives depending on context.)
One of the figures who is never, or rarely mentioned in these discussions, and yet is the primary fore-runner of the idea of false conscousness in Western thought, and a fundamental influence on figures like Tolle and possibly Castaneda (assuming he did make it up - not saying he did), and indeed on all of us when we discuss these ideas, is Karl Marx. Marx posited the idea that people are held in false consciousness by the powers that be - an idea taken up much more fundamentally by continental neo Marxist thinkers such as Marcuse and Althusser - and that 'revolutionary consciousness' occurs when people realise the truth of their situation.
That begins to tell you just how political and ideological ideas on awareness are, even when framed in 'spiritual' contexts. For example, what do you become are 'of'? Everything? Abstract perceptions of the world? Capitalist oppression? Does 'be here now' re-direct you from achieving revolutionary consciousness by directing you away from examining political realities and instead totally focussing on the hedonism of personal experience? And if that were so, is Tolle just another layer of control - just another tool being used to prevent you from focussing on what is really going on?
Or is it the Marxists who are using it as a means of control? After all, it's easy to say that anyone who doesn't agree with you isn't 'aware' - that they don't have the same 'level' of consciousness as you. That excuses you from having to listen to their ideas or treat them as valid. You can simply treat the 'holders' of those ideas as incapable of seeing the truth, rather as if they had a mental illness, because their 'awareness' is merely that of their masters, like a beast.
And many 'spiritual' people use that idea too - the idea that if a person doesn't agree with their schema, they're not simply wrong, they're 'spiritually unaware', or brainwashed by the establishment, etc. One idea constantly re-iterated - incorrectly in my view - is the idea, or versions of the idea of Castaneda's 'foreign installation' as a Marxian layer of state/system brainwashed in to you way of looking at the world. That's a very similar idea to Marx's. Unfortunately, it's not what Castaneda/don Juan meant. They meant something much more complex - that even your sense of self, of who you are, of even being named and placing a label on the series of events that that label refers to 'creates' a self which is at once both the core mechanism of your self awareness, and a system installed by society and the world around you.
So which 'thing' is it that's aware? You? The state? The you the state created? And what is it that it's 'best' to be 'aware of'? Now? Then? What will be? Yourself? Your own silence?
Awareness - a tricky thing indeed!
|
|
Bookmarks