• Lucid Dreaming - Dream Views




    Results 1 to 18 of 18
    Like Tree1Likes
    • 1 Post By Original Poster

    Thread: Workers as Share-Holders

    1. #1
      D.V. Editor-in-Chief Original Poster's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jun 2006
      LD Count
      Lucid Now
      Gender
      Location
      3D
      Posts
      8,263
      Likes
      4139
      DJ Entries
      11

      Workers as Share-Holders

      Let's leave the totalitarian aspects of communism aside and focus on one basic idea: rather than make companies up of share-holders who employ the workers, why not make the workers the share-holders, with their profit dependent upon the success of the company?

      If you like the idea, explain how you think it could work.

      If you dislike the idea, explain why you think it could not work.

      Everything works out in the end, sometimes even badly.


    2. #2
      Member
      Join Date
      Jul 2007
      Posts
      528
      Likes
      16
      I've always been very supportive of this idea, worker co-ops, almost a fairer form of capitalism in a way because the worker is sharing the risk as well.

      A wage should be paid aswell, but as in a normal company, there is both wages and dividends, the dividends would top-up the wages.

    3. #3
      LD's this year: ~7 tommo's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jan 2007
      Gender
      Location
      Melbourne
      Posts
      9,202
      Likes
      4986
      DJ Entries
      7
      How would the shares be divided?
      I assume there would have to be some sort of minimum share per worker, depending on their position?
      If it were decided with contracts, you'd end up with the same situation we have now because desperate people would sign any contract (work for basically nothing).

      Why do you think this is superior?

    4. #4
      Member
      Join Date
      Feb 2004
      Posts
      5,165
      Likes
      709
      Walmart does that, I think they like match any shares the employee buys to some limit. They also give bonuses to people at stores that do really well. It doesn't seem to be very effective however, since most people at wal-mart still don't seem to like their jobs very much, and as I understand it, things like that are meant to be motivators.

    5. #5
      Lucid Shaman mcwillis's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jan 2010
      Posts
      1,469
      Likes
      463
      DJ Entries
      3
      Walmart also takes out life insurance poilicies on carefully selected employees that fit certain statistical data. If a walmart employee dies the store cashes in on their death. They make a tidy sum from their insurance policies. They don't care about their employees at all.

      Please click on the links below, more techniques under investigation to come soon...


    6. #6
      Wololo Achievements:
      Created Dream Journal Tagger Second Class 1000 Hall Points Made lots of Friends on DV Populated Wall Referrer Bronze Veteran First Class
      Supernova's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jul 2009
      LD Count
      Gender
      Location
      Spiral out, keep going.
      Posts
      2,909
      Likes
      908
      DJ Entries
      10
      Quote Originally Posted by Omnis Dei View Post
      the totalitarian aspects of communism
      Surely you're not this dumb. You mean to refer to Stalinism. Russia had true communism for all of about 2 months. Marx would have been one of the last people to advocate totalitarian anything.

      Aside from that, I think this is a very interesting idea, and this is the kind of discussion that needs to be going on on a large scale right now.

    7. #7
      D.V. Editor-in-Chief Original Poster's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jun 2006
      LD Count
      Lucid Now
      Gender
      Location
      3D
      Posts
      8,263
      Likes
      4139
      DJ Entries
      11
      Quote Originally Posted by Alric View Post
      Walmart does that, I think they like match any shares the employee buys to some limit. They also give bonuses to people at stores that do really well. It doesn't seem to be very effective however, since most people at wal-mart still don't seem to like their jobs very much, and as I understand it, things like that are meant to be motivators.
      They don't do what I'm talking about. Giving stock options to employees is a different style than basing the ownership of a company around the workforce.

      Quote Originally Posted by Supernova View Post
      Surely you're not this dumb. You mean to refer to Stalinism. Russia had true communism for all of about 2 months. Marx would have been one of the last people to advocate totalitarian anything.

      Aside from that, I think this is a very interesting idea, and this is the kind of discussion that needs to be going on on a large scale right now.
      I agree but most considerations of communism have been manipulated to consider it the same as a Fascist Government Monopoly on industry. What I was trying to say was imagine communism without a centralized power structure (in b4 cmind says then its not communism), but rather that businesses remained independent (aside from regulation to protect the environment and stuff) but also adopted a model where the workers owned the companies they work for.

      Everything works out in the end, sometimes even badly.


    8. #8
      Wololo Achievements:
      Created Dream Journal Tagger Second Class 1000 Hall Points Made lots of Friends on DV Populated Wall Referrer Bronze Veteran First Class
      Supernova's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jul 2009
      LD Count
      Gender
      Location
      Spiral out, keep going.
      Posts
      2,909
      Likes
      908
      DJ Entries
      10
      Quote Originally Posted by Omnis Dei View Post
      imagine communism without a centralized power structure
      In other words, communism.

    9. #9
      Oneironaut Achievements:
      Veteran First Class 5000 Hall Points
      ThePreserver's Avatar
      Join Date
      Feb 2010
      Gender
      Posts
      1,428
      Likes
      1047
      I think that's an interesting idea, but there should absolutely be a wage that can sustain employees, since the success of the company is not entirely reliant on their own work.

      If it were, say, 10% of their wage, that would be a pretty interesting idea.

    10. #10
      Member
      Join Date
      Feb 2004
      Posts
      5,165
      Likes
      709
      I know it isn't exactly the same, just setting up a reference to similar things that are actually done. If you own any stock, in a sense you do own part of the company. So any sort of stock sharing program does kind of do it. If the stocks are not options and just given then people might start wondering if its coming out of their pay and if they would get paid more if they turned the stocks down.

      I think what you are talking about does happen in small businesses though. Especially when a few people create the business them self and are all partners. The thing is the new people they bring in are usually not brought in as partners but instead as employees.

    11. #11
      Sleeping Dragon juroara's Avatar
      Join Date
      May 2006
      Gender
      Location
      San Antonio, TX
      Posts
      3,866
      Likes
      1172
      DJ Entries
      144
      I worked for an employee owned company, at first I thought it was lame because you have to work an x number of hours before you're given company stock, and it was something like, three years :b

      Well, turned out I was stuck there for three years so I got stock in the company! This year I'll be able to take out money! Yay! All companies should be employee owned, and that means every member in the company gets stock.

    12. #12
      D.V. Editor-in-Chief Original Poster's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jun 2006
      LD Count
      Lucid Now
      Gender
      Location
      3D
      Posts
      8,263
      Likes
      4139
      DJ Entries
      11
      Quote Originally Posted by Supernova View Post
      In other words, communism.
      I am distinguishing between actual communism and the practice of communism/misconceptions of communism. Forgive me for not ignoring the commonly held (but misconstrued) definition of the philosophy.

      Anyways, this hybrid form you guys are talking about isn't exactly what I had in mind because it's too easy to cheat the workers or, as someone pointed out, make them think they're getting paid in stock when they really just want a paycheck.

      I'm thinking, since Walmart was brought up, that the Walton's should only own as much stock as would be due a manager, which should not be too much more than what the average worker gets. I think industry is the root of power and therefore democracy can only work when it starts within industry, with the employees electing their overseers, and deciding the direction of their company, rather than being subject to this antiquated system.
      Last edited by Omnis Dei; 01-26-2012 at 11:53 AM.
      Supernova likes this.

      Everything works out in the end, sometimes even badly.


    13. #13
      Wololo Achievements:
      Created Dream Journal Tagger Second Class 1000 Hall Points Made lots of Friends on DV Populated Wall Referrer Bronze Veteran First Class
      Supernova's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jul 2009
      LD Count
      Gender
      Location
      Spiral out, keep going.
      Posts
      2,909
      Likes
      908
      DJ Entries
      10
      Quote Originally Posted by Omnis Dei View Post
      I am distinguishing between actual communism and the practice of communism/misconceptions of communism. Forgive me for not ignoring the commonly held (but misconstrued) definition of the philosophy.

      Anyways, this hybrid form you guys are talking about isn't exactly what I had in mind because it's too easy to cheat the workers or, as someone pointed out, make them think they're getting paid in stock when they really just want a paycheck.

      I'm thinking, since Walmart was brought up, that the Walton's should only own as much stock as would be due a manager, which should not be too much more than what the average worker gets. I think industry is the root of power and therefore democracy can only work when it starts within industry, with the employees electing their overseers, and deciding the direction of their company, rather than being subject to this antiquated system.
      So basially, one could speak of it as a mixed economy, but rather than mixed capitalism/soialism, mixed capitalism/communism. It's a very interesting proposal, one that I think deserves further examination (though to actually achieve it would not be easy because the companies, especially the most significant ones, are currently owned by the high upper class, and I'm sure you've noticed they don't often like to share willingly).

    14. #14
      D.V. Editor-in-Chief Original Poster's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jun 2006
      LD Count
      Lucid Now
      Gender
      Location
      3D
      Posts
      8,263
      Likes
      4139
      DJ Entries
      11
      It would have to prove more successful, not just more fair. The concept would have to triumph on the open market.

      Edit: Or perhaps it would require a revolution. Apparently this idea already took the form of the IWW and the Anarcho-Syndicalism philosophy, but the movement was crushed, the advocates rounded up and given 20 year prison sentences, and the public mind warped to associate the organization with the Bolsheviks. I wonder, were the idea to regain popularity now, could the reaction be similar?
      Last edited by Omnis Dei; 01-28-2012 at 11:51 AM.

      Everything works out in the end, sometimes even badly.


    15. #15
      Member Achievements:
      Made lots of Friends on DV Populated Wall Tagger First Class Created Dream Journal Referrer Silver 1000 Hall Points Veteran First Class

      Join Date
      Apr 2011
      Posts
      1,056
      Likes
      697
      DJ Entries
      8
      One of the potential problems of this idea that I can see is the loss of said workers' savings (for retirement etc) due to overinvestment in company shares.

    16. #16
      DEATH TO FANATICS! StonedApe's Avatar
      Join Date
      Aug 2008
      Gender
      Location
      toledo,OH
      Posts
      2,269
      Likes
      417
      DJ Entries
      61
      I like this idea, but I doubt that it could work anytime soon because workers don't have any means of making it happen. And the consumers simply don't give a fuck outside of the short term. This could happen if consumers decided to think about the long term effects of their purchases, but we need a cultural revolution for that to happen.

      There are companies like this that already exist, but not many.The Thermo Twin Story. It's a great idea, but it requires people to think about something other than themselves while shopping which seems impossible at the moment.

      Also even if you did this would the workers really have a say? I'm not sure how the stock market works but wouldn't a low level employee at wal-mart have such a small percentage(like .001%) that they wouldn't have any say in hiring of managers and things like this? This is another big part of the problem with getting something like anarcho-sydicalism working in the modern world. Massive corporations like this just aren't compatible with that sort of thing. It requires people to change their lifestyle which doesn't seem likely until something forces them too.
      157 is a prime number. The next prime is 163 and the previous prime is 151, which with 157 form a sexy prime triplet. Taking the arithmetic mean of those primes yields 157, thus it is a balanced prime.

      Women and rhythm section first - Jaco Pastorious

    17. #17
      D.V. Editor-in-Chief Original Poster's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jun 2006
      LD Count
      Lucid Now
      Gender
      Location
      3D
      Posts
      8,263
      Likes
      4139
      DJ Entries
      11
      It could not be a hybrid form, that much is clear. Giving employees stock options is not at all a viable means of this. Non-producers would have to be prohibited from owning stock in the company. I'm not saying the entire company would have to be run by the factory workers, but the factory workers would elect the managers and CEOs the same way the stock-holders do in this society.

      Everything works out in the end, sometimes even badly.


    18. #18
      D.V. Editor-in-Chief Original Poster's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jun 2006
      LD Count
      Lucid Now
      Gender
      Location
      3D
      Posts
      8,263
      Likes
      4139
      DJ Entries
      11
      Here's a video on anarcho-syndicalism and libertarian socialism, skip to 1:30 to get past the norwegian introduction



      Chompsky: "State Socialism is a contradiction in terms"

      You cannot give the worker control over production while centralizing control into one monolithic overseer.
      Last edited by Omnis Dei; 02-04-2012 at 02:20 AM.

      Everything works out in the end, sometimes even badly.


    Similar Threads

    1. The Holders
      By Azatos in forum Dream Control
      Replies: 1
      Last Post: 02-16-2010, 12:58 AM
    2. LDing for Night Workers
      By Richter in forum General Lucid Discussion
      Replies: 2
      Last Post: 06-21-2007, 07:02 AM

    Bookmarks

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •