Arg, I wrote a whoooole post concerning this and it's lost. But consider this. A brief synopsis of the page or so that I wrote (I don't have the time to redo it all, but I really want to discuss this. It may be a little jumbled, but think about the big picture):

I had this thought the other day (title of the post). I was led to it by my study of Buddhist principles over the past year and few months. I have yet to read about Objectivism, but I was led to it by political media referencing Ayn Rand, and it seems to contradict Buddhist principles on the basis that the nature of being is only within the self. Consider zero, perfect nothingness. Buddhism holds that in becoming 'nothing', we realize that we are everything, and holds a general model for spirituality that is common across religions of the world, if properly understood. Zero is a concept that surfaces in ancient cultures across the world. Consider the size of the current moment, it may be represented only by the perfection of zero, and in our lifetimes we experience an infinite number of current moments. The past is gone, and the future is not here yet, there is only the perfect, immeasurable, now. Like one of those calculus problems with the rocket, where it occupies an infinite number of positions in a finite amount of time and distance. Consider that the best representation of zero may be a perfect circle, impossible in the physical world, perfect nothingness, and like a ring, having no beginning, and no end.
If everything that happens to you is the best thing that can happen to you (Chris Prentiss, 2009, an awesome book), then everything that happens is the best thing that can happen. And so everything that can happen, happens. Consider the implications for the human perception of 'time', and whether or not it really exists...

I saw a meme on facebook about a year ago (I know, hardly credible information, but hear me out) that said that an interview with a Mayan elder purportedly held that beginning in December 2012 we will gradually move out of the age of the fourth sun (materialism) and into the age of the fifth sun (enlightenment). Its not an apocalypse theory, nor is it good or bad, it simply is. And if the ancients really did base their knowledge off of astrology, using math to form spiritual beliefs, then this may be the most credible and rational explanation of what they meant to convey.

As I was investigating the basics of Objectivism, I began to have these thoughts. Then one night, I had them on my mind as I was going to sleep, and was half asleep and half awake while pondering all this (kinda weird state of consciousness, hard to explain). I was pondering philosophy, science, and politics, and how they all play into each other, and I awoke suddenly from this state, close to such an idea, but couldn't fully put it together. It took me a couple of days of consideration, and then it hit me. So I googled 'what if math and spirituality are the same thing?' and read the first link it turned up. Google it now and read it, I can't post links. Its called 'The Nothing That Is Everything'. Mr. Wiley explains it beautifully, better than I ever could, though I do not have particular skill with mathematics.

I don't think it can be any other way... If we are to seek to become nothing, in order to realize that we are everything, then this would be a perfect mathematical statement of such. All the world's religions (rightly understood) as well as math and science would be right...

This is not nearly as well written as what I had when I started writing, but the main ideas are there (most of them, I think) and this post has been kind of rushed.

I would like to hear what others think of such an idea. And also, if you have an understanding of Objectivism, I would particularly like to hear from you. Read the article if you haven't already, it explains it quite well. I would appreciate your input, and thank you for reading all of this.