 Originally Posted by Universal Mind
Jesus Fucking Christ, why are you still saying that I am claiming Lanza wasn't alive? I have been extremely clear about this. You are just being straight up dishonest. If you do that one more damn time, I'm done discussing this with you. Read what I write if you are going to comment on it. All we have is the word of some cops and the medical examiner that Lanza was alive. Isn't it odd that there is no photograph of Lanza at the school although the school had a high quality surveillance system? Well, isn't it???? Nobody verifies that he was alive in the three years before Sandy Hook. He stopped showing up at his barber shop, kids were telling their parents that he was no longer around, he had no computer accounts, neighbors never saw him any more. He was not seen by anybody who was alive after Sandy Hook. That means shit doesn't add up. It doesn't mean I am completely convinced Adam was not alive. Don't miss this point again.
Go to my last post and start the documentary, Sandy Hoaxed 2nd Edition - The Sandy Hook Gun Control False Flag, and watch it starting at 36:35. You will get the picture of why there his an enormous hole in the Adam Lanza claim. I have another challenge for you. Find a picture of Adam and Ryan Lanza together. Can you do that? I am not convinced that they aren't the same person. There is good evidence suggesting that they very well may be. Watch the documentary clip. The facts are astounding.
You are the one being dishonest here. You basically claimed that you believe he was either dead or is a made up person that never existed, yet you wont provide any evidence for that. In fact, you already mentioned he had a social security number. So if Adam never existed and is really Ryan, why does he have a social security number? Does the conspiracy go all the way back to when he was born? Not to mention that Ryan doesn't really look that much like him.
You can't just say that the shooter is probably either dead or never even existed, then say, "Well I didn't make any claim" and I am just throwing out ideas. Why would you suggest just silly and far out things, unless you thought they were serious ideas that were true?
 Originally Posted by Universal Mind
You're being ridiculous because you are stumped. Many of the people who really seem like crisis actors... ARE actors! Get it? This isn't rocket science.
No what I said makes perfect sense, your claims are the ridiculous one. First off musicians are not actors. Musicians play music, they are not actors, by the very definition of the words they are not the same. If someone wants to film a movie they hire actors, not musicians. If someone is putting on a play, they hire actors not musicians. Why would musicians be actors? Secondly, how can you claim they are professional actors, when you also claimed they sucked at acting?
 Originally Posted by Universal Mind
Uh, I'm saying they don't look the same. Madeline and Emilie do not look the same. Got it? Madeline and Emilie do not look the same. Okay? They don't look the same. So why are you saying that the girl who looks identical to Emilie in the Obama photo is Madeline? It's very obviously Emilie. There should be no confusion. Madeline and Emilie do not look the same! Get it?
The girl in the photo with obama is clearly Madeline. When you compare close up of their faces, it is extremely obvious that Madeline in the picture with obama is in fact Madeline and not Emilie. She only looks similar to Emilie when view from further away because she wore a hand me down dress.
 Originally Posted by Universal Mind
Did you pause the video and SEE THE CIRCLE?????
It is a circle of people. Perhaps you should consider getting glasses.
Again you keep ignoring my points. You can't see a circle when the video is paused. Any group of people will look like a circle if you pause it. That gives you no information on where they are going. Pausing it just shows you that at that given time there was people on all sides of the building, it doesn't prove they were walking in a circle. Like I said over and over and over, there is no one in the video who walks around in that circle. Which means it isn't a circle, it is just a group of people.
 Originally Posted by Universal Mind
An intelligent person challenges you to prove it and does not agree with you until you actually have proven it. Pressure is worthless on a critical thinker.
The answer I was looking for, was that they get extremely defensive, and make up excuses, like you are doing now. Here is an interesting article that I think you should read. You are basically doing what they describe in it. The more evidence we show that you are wrong, the more you dig your heels in, and the more excuses you make up to justify the position you have.
How facts backfire - The Boston Globe
|
|
Bookmarks