Thread: Evolution is a Fact - Not a Theory

Originally Posted by celestra

First of all I did not bother myself reading all your long post. Looks like you absrobed too much information without analyzing it through.

Thank you for your most amazing criticism and advice, O great one. Please, we both know there is no need to say such things.

I disagree with Darwins theory.
I even wrote an essay about it. Ill post it here for your information. Certainly we are not monkeys.

I think that you will find that there is no evolutionist that disagress with this. Humans are humans - not monkeys.

If we would agree with the fact that we live in a machine world as Newton, Descartes and Einstein stated in their works, every human either a random mutation by Darwin’s theory, how can we explain the sudden increase of human intellectuality changed in one century?

How come it took us million years to evolve from apes to Homo sapiens who used basic natural instruments for survival, when in only 50 years we could produce a machine unique of its kind such as computer that can perform incredible functions? One hundred years ago, people used candles instead of lights, used carriages instead of cars and suddenly cars were introduced as the new vehicle in 1900.
I understand we evolve intellectually and move forward but who can explain the sudden huge advancement in only few years? Einstein would argue with his notion of atoms, billions small particles that form a physical human being that can randomly mutate and most likely produce cell arrangement.

I do not see how this disputes evolution. This only propogates it.

Descartes would explain the fast increase of technology due to some chemical reactions produced in our brains.
But our body is composed of 8 billion atoms and the certainty of atoms each fusing together is one to 8 billion, so it is impossible that the majority of atoms when fuse, create a sudden change in intellectuality, even if this is true it would take billions of years to get to stage where we are. Yes we are composed of atoms, but I disagree on the fact that we act upon some chemical reactions happening in our mind.

Sorry, but simply disagreeing is not sufficient. The fact is that if you have an increase of dopamine, you will become more excited - this is inarguable. There are various other neurotransmitters that incontrovertably influence your concsiousness. If you can dispute this, I am very willing to read it. However, please pardon me when I say I have a great lack of confidence that you can disprove the entire science of neurology.

Darwin dismissed a fact in his theory that leads to a misunderstanding, if every human being has unique fingerprint and unique DNA and on our planet habited by 8 billions of human beings live, if we were a random mutation, at least one pair of human being would have the same DNA, which is not the case.

Please show me where he disagreed with this because this seems completely opposite to the content of the Origin of Species. Furthermore, chaos theory is an integral function to evolutionary theory in contemporary times.

If human being origins from apes, how come apes still exist in form of animals if we started to grow and evolve physically in the same environment? Creation started with all living beings surviving together until the state of Earth changed and islands formed from collisions out of space, the story of Big Bang for example. We can assume that after one comet fall on Earth separation occurred in the continents, some species dispersed on different places.

...

You think that, becaues one species arises, that all previous species should be extinct? It is survival of the fittest, not replace the obsolete. For someone who claims that I know nothing of what I am talking about, I find it hard to take this seriously.

This phase lets assume is called the beginning of the evolvement.
On one side apes live on an island and on the other side of the continent reside the other apes. There is a small probability that these apes on two different continents will evolve in the same way physically, due to their different environment.

Precisely.

It is impossible that one island of apes evolves into a human being while the other one does not. Since the evolvement starts at their point when they split up, they should evolve in the same way, maybe in shape differently, but intellectually the same, unless some other factors contribute to their evolvement. They go trough environmental changes possibly differently, but Darwin explains that only one population one an island evolves while the other one doesn’t make a lot of effort. He thought that is why apes still exist. He proclaims as if time stops for one species to evolve mentally while the other evolves too fast. The probability of highly intellectual mutation is low and mutations in a population can be expected to obey more regularities than those among individuals, because of the similarities in survival benefits and the laws of large numbers.

No, it is not a matter of effort or deliberate action. Furthermore, your straw-manning the argument by isolating the environmental factors and stochastic system.

So read this again and reorganize your thoughts.
Thanks

For the purpose of mutual enlightenment; Likewise.

What do you think...?
~