Well our personalities are pretty much different.

Man, look at the human potential. Look at the horizon we have. Our society can be much better.

No matter how comforting it can sound, being wrong isn't a good kind of convenience in my opinion. If you dislike to be right, because it involves effort, then you should pretty much give up pointing out your opinion.


All I see is prejudice in your post. Judging naturalistic people too much.

Me:
If you accept a Christian to spread their beliefs, why don't you accept a naturalistic to spread his? That's pretty much biased i guess.

You:
Ow of course i'm biased.


I'd rather not be known at all than be known as a bad person.


The same way you agree with religious people spreading their faith, I agree with naturalistic people fighting people's faith.

You must pretty much like the bliss of ignorance. I respect you for that, but find you rather weak of character.

If you say you wouldn't want science to one day know everything, then it means you don't want to know, you wanna close your eyes.

Again a previous argument of mine proves useful:

Science is always changing and adaptating to new data, so that it is always as close as possible to being correct.
Faith is believing blindly in something and never changing it. If your beliefs are wrong, you'll be wrong for a lifetime.

And yet again I'll state I choose science. My reasons are obvious.