 Originally Posted by PhilosopherStoned
"Energy" is just as much an abstract notion when taken in the spiritual sense as in the sense of physics.
I have to wonder. Why do new agers insist on using the term that was defined by and for science? It would make sense except that there are already terms for what new agers are talking about that predate the scientific word and definition by at least a thousand years, e.g. Kundalini and Ki. Is it because the whole new age movement is a shallow impersonation of any real understanding and, deep down, new agers understand this and hence draw vocabulary from science to fraudulantly give themselves credibility? That hypothesis would explain why new agers always say "the ancients said that" whenever science discovers something as well. Two phenomena explained with one hypothesis. I might be onto something...
I don't think that in this particular context that the word "energy" was used to describe something "new agey." I think it was used in the context in which people say,
Bob: "Hey, want to go to the ball game today?"
NotBob: "Nah, I don't have the energy for it."
Would you also assume that to mean something new agey? I could be mistaken, but I think focusing on the use of the word "energy" in this thread is irrelevant, and completely bypasses the overall point of the thread, which is otherwise quite valid. Though I agree with you, that people tend to toss around the term "energy" to give the sense of some sort of qualification or validity to unverifiable claims. Then again, no one really understands energy in it's entirety.
In any case, the thread is more about practicing awareness of a moment, and awareness of one's own thoughts, and feelings, and their origins, and how they can dictate one's actions and mood if one is not aware of them, and that awareness reduces those problems. To allow the "mind," or "ego," or "pain body," or whatever one might like to call it to focus on something negative, is to allow that thing to grow. I am content at this moment. I know that when I feel content, without me even realizing it, my thoughts wander, until they land on something painful. I can at that point give it "energy" (which really is just a way to describe the ability for it to grow, i think,) by continuing to dwell on those negative thoughts and feelings, or I can make a choice to return to this moment. The past anymore is nothing more than electrical signals in one's brain. To dwell on it will often bring about pain.
On a side note, PhilosopherStoned, I understand that you dislike the people whose existence you've decided to simplify into the extraordinarily general, disappointingly narrow-minded label of "new agers," but it is not always necessary to express your detest for their opinions at every opportunity, which I've noticed that lately it seems like you do. Particularly in this case, you've managed to take something that [I don't believe} wasn't intended to imply a "new-ager" concept, and turn it into an accusation for "new-agers" twisting science around. And it is so very saddening to see someone so amazingly brilliant take a very very large group of people, and write them off in such a way because they believe in something that is outside of the bounds of what you believe. Forgetting that there are an infinite number of amazing things that you don't know about each individual one of them. This is true of all people. If I've misinterpreted your attitude behind your condemnation of people into the overly-simplistic term of "new-agers," than I do sincerely apologize. I'm truly not trying to be offensive or condescending to you, at all. I just think that this isn't the place. I'm sorry for going off on another tangent for a moment. Please continue normal discussion.
|
|
Bookmarks