Quote Originally Posted by Mayatara View Post
One word for you... OK, many words: matter is just electric signals that your brain interprets. This may sound very Matrixy, but it's a scientific fact. Matter isn't really there, it's only your brain perception of probability clouds of "events". Knowing that, non-material is actually the only thing there is.
As has been pointed out to you, I think you need to seriously rethink your philosophy, because at the moment it is self-contradictory.

It is self-contradictory because you base your argument around matter being 'electric signals that your brain interprets'; however, this posits the objective existence of electric signals (which, assuming you're talking about neural activity, are in fact the movement of ions; matter), and also of your own brain, which entirely contradicts your conclusion that there are no material things. How can there be only non-material things if even you claim that to create these things you require a material brain?

Also there are assertions in there which aren't true, or at least aren't qualified and need to be. It is not at all a scientific fact that 'matter is just electric signals your brain interprets'.

If you don't see it doesn't mean it isn't there.
Correct, there being no evidence for something does not disprove it. However, it does follow that there is absolutely no rational reason to believe in it.