The two main types of visualisation:
2D Inward
The more common of the two, images appear like a 2d screen within your vision. An analogy for this would be standing at the back of a darkened room looking out of the window on the opposite wall, or looking at a TV. Actually the first analogy i made to this was of looking through a rectangular box (slightly tapering towards the screen) at a screen on the other side of the box.
This inwards visualisation doesnt have much of a kick to it, what ive found is even when the images are clear and colourful the scene is always... lacking something. Its somewhat flat, its seperate from yourself, theres no integration, you're simply observing a scene, you arn't really part of that scene in anyway like you are in a lucid dream for instance.
3D/Outward
This type of visualisation then is much more powerful. The image seems to extend beyond your line of site, you get the feeling that if you turned your head you would see more of the image thats currently out of sight. The major difference with this type of imagery then when compared to 2D is that you feel part of the scene, its like walking out of the darkened room and actually leaving the house, being out in the garden instead of viewing it through a window. As you can appreciate even if the colour is the same, you cant fully appreciate a garden through a window, you have to go out into the environment.
From my limited testing, 3D visualisation with low colour is a greater experience than 2D with great colour.
I intend to discuss achieving 3D imagery later, but one method i found quite useful was to visualise with open eyes. aslong as you're in such a situation as to have very little or no light in your eyes the brain should continue to focus on internal stimulas more than external.
Cutting the link to reality:
In all internal work such as visualisation its important to distance oneself from the outward environment. Distractions are everywhere, and the less we take notice of our 5 physical senses the more the brain will start to crank up its internal processing capabilities. That is to say that the less the brain has to process external stimulas through the physical senses, the more it grasps for internal imagined stimulas from the internal and imagined senses..
This obviously only applies WHILE visualising.. not during normal waking life.
Supplying the ingredients:
Another important observation ive made is that my brain will quite happily take over the job of creating my internal environment for me, all i have to do is supply the ingredients and it will make the cake.
Example:
Many times i've wanted to visualize a beach but had difficulty, by visualizing easier to imagine things such as a close up of sand, a seagul, maybe a palm tree and a cloud, the brain seems to take over (aslong as its focussed more on internal processing and not external) and creates a nice looking beach scene very rapidly.
From notes:
Ive found from past experimenting that if i forcefully visualize sand, then water, my brain sometimes creates an entire scene based around sand and water. It may not be exactly as id expected it, but the brain has still taken over and quickly built a huge scene from very little user input.
The key then is the handover, getting the brain to use the ingredients and create a scene. Im sure in the near future ill be talking about the conditions needed for a successful handover.
Summary of supplying ingredients:
I can exploit the brains natural anchoring and linking functions to have it create a complex scene for me. I cant however guarantee or fully control how it will turn out.
Memories
Memories seem to be a great way to stimulate visualisation, thinking of someones face or a scene you're familiar with for instance seems to aid in the creation of imagery.
Transfer of colours:
Ive found that I can use similar coloured objects to transfer colour to an image. If im having trouble picturing vibrant green grass for instance i can imagine a poster or item of clothing thats a similar colour and can transfer the memory of that colour onto the grass. This seemed pretty effective when making the beach scene water more.. turquoisy.
Foreground movement for background stability and quality?
In a recent hypnopompic experience i found that foreground movement seemed to increase the clarity and quality of the background environment. This came in an experience i had which started in somewhat poor quality, but picturing a raven flying into the foreground, landing on a post infront of my vision seemed to increase the quality. It seemed to be the birds movements (flapping n such) that somehow kicked my internal processing up a gear.
Now im aware that human vision relies on movement, if not external then at least eye movement, infact holding your vision in one location is proof as you notice everything going black and fuzzy around your focus. Maybe theres something more to this, ill have to explore the roll of movement on imagery.
The rogue mind
Ive realised through practice that the mind hates to be controlled. The best results i have are when i let it do its own thing. I dont wish to view my mind as an enemy, but i have to for this analogy. Its like the mind doesnt like to share good visuals, its programmed/evolved in such a way that it naturally protects conciousness coming into contact with good visuals. Its for this reason that alot of my idea's and experiences have evolved around understanding and exploiting the minds functions, as opposed to trying to force or bend it to my will.
It seems best then to give the mind its freedom, but keep it on a loose leash, gently directing it to keep it on task but allowing it to do most of what it wants (think those dog leads with expandable length). The bonus about this is ive found, in the case of supplying ingredients, that you can actually allow it to do the work for you, and have some control over it, but without the battle.
note:
I often think maybe im wrong about this, maybe the best way is to dominate the mind, to gain full control over it, instead of simply exploiting it... Im yet to find a way to do this though
The frosted window/jigsaw filter
It seems sometimes that a part of my visualisation is clearer and more colourful than other parts. Like im viewing a sheet of frosted glass with a peice missing. I can sometimes focus in on these clear parts and enhance the entire image. Its almost like the brain applies a filter to the image and im trying to get past it, ill sometimes spot these weaknesses i can use to my advantage.
Bookmarks