Quote Originally Posted by debrajane View Post
I

have vigorously defended Nick Newport and his work to the hilt.

And I will continue to do so on this thread (which is about his 102) and on the other thread (which is about his 101).
Why? What compels you to defend him like this?

The best thing I've heard about 'his' techniques is that mcwillis got a single lucid using one of the more original ones. Of course he admits continued use brought no further success, which leads me to believe it was just placebo.

Again, I ask, why defend this man? Do all of you just find him attractive or something? 'Cause I don't see it.