• Lucid Dreaming - Dream Views




    Page 29 of 40 FirstFirst ... 19 27 28 29 30 31 39 ... LastLast
    Results 701 to 725 of 993
    Like Tree12Likes

    Thread: Anyone else met the Night Stalkers and Dream Walkers?

    1. #701
      Dream Worm Croneus's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jun 2008
      Gender
      Location
      Vegas baby!
      Posts
      70
      Likes
      1
      Quote Originally Posted by Sandform View Post
      It may also be due to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apoptosis .

      In early childhood many kids have what some may call photographic memory, but it doesn't stay with them into adulthood because of apoptosis in the brain.

      Apoptosis doesn't affect brain cells in the same way. The nuerons form new synapses and are still able to access and replicate information by doing so. Typically apoptosis will only affect brain cells that are damaged by physical trauma, or by a virus or toxin in order to try to save healthy nuerons. Eventually old age too. I've never heard of children with eidetic/photographic memories losing it.
      Everyone knows what happens in Vegas stays in Vegas, however, few are familiar with the North Vegas slogan: What happens in North Vegas will haunt your dreams forever.

    2. #702
      Emotionally unsatisfied. Sandform's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jul 2007
      Gender
      Location
      Texas
      Posts
      4,298
      Likes
      24
      Quote Originally Posted by Croneus View Post
      Apoptosis doesn't affect brain cells in the same way. The nuerons form new synapses and are still able to access and replicate information by doing so. Typically apoptosis will only affect brain cells that are damaged by physical trauma, or by a virus or toxin in order to try to save healthy nuerons. Eventually old age too. I've never heard of children with eidetic/photographic memories losing it.
      I actually read it in a book called Mapping the Mind by Rita Carter. I don't have the book anymore but some searching found me...The piece of link itself seems to actually be from Carter.

      http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/SL_Psyc...etic_interplay


      Neuroplasticity is the brain’s ability to create new neural pathways based on new experiences. It takes place over a lifetime, sometimes over genetically-determined critical periods. At birth, there are approximately 2,500 synapses in the cerebral cortex of a human baby.By three years old, the cerebral cortex has about 15,000 synapses (Gopnick et al., 1999). Because the infant brain has such a huge capacity for growth, it must eventually be pruned down. Synaptic pruning, or apoptosis, is the programmed neuron cell death that takes place during early childhood and adolescence. Pruning actually strengthens important connections and eliminates weaker ones, creating more effective neural communication (Brain Plasticity,2006). Many times children lose their eidetic or photographic memory during apaptosis. An incomplete pruning results in so-called idiot savantes while overkill apoptosis my strip too many connections and lead to Down’s syndrome (Carter, 1998).

    3. #703
      Member JET73L's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jun 2008
      Gender
      Posts
      854
      Likes
      1
      Erm, back to the nightstalkers/dreamwalkers thing, can anyone explain what exactly is going on with them? I read about 8 pages of this thread, but alkl I could really gather were that they were beings (typpiucally human) that sem to be able to "enter" others' dreams (some sort of telepathy?) and that the dreamwalkers are either good or neutral, the Night Stalkers are actively malicious,* and there are also watchers, (who may or may nopt be human, but by their name I assume theior prerogative does not include interfering in other's dreeams, but merely observing?).
      If the answers to these questions can be found earlier in the thread, I could go back and read it, but if it's going to be as fruitless an effort as it seems, I figuresd I may as well ask here. First of all, is there any way to differentiate between a NS/DW and a regular dream character? If you regularly meet sentient-seeming dream characters who do not conform to any of your own dream styloes, are they likely dream walkers, or merely dream characters? Are these actively encountered beings, have people here actually had proven dreams where they encountered a DW/NS that they later met in real life and confirmed the dream encounter, or is this purely theoretical? This sort of thing seems to be important, and I wish to gather more information. FI anyone can answer these questions, or add anything odf importance I may have missed, thank you.



      *as opposed to magically delicious. Sorry, but it was necessary to stop thinking of lucky the leprechaun saying lucky charms are actively malicious.
      Goals completed since joining: 10 -- Last goal completed: February 17, 2009
      Uncontrolled lucid dreams:23.5--controlled lucid dreams:24.5
      --WILDs:16.5--MILDs:1.5--DILDs:22--DEILDs:8--Quasilucids(do not count):3--
      --LTotMBasic:0--LTotMAdvanced:1--LTotY:0--
      JET73L's dream journal

    4. #704
      Dream Worm Croneus's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jun 2008
      Gender
      Location
      Vegas baby!
      Posts
      70
      Likes
      1
      Sorry to drag it off topic again but...

      The first line of the summary says it all: "Today a brain scan reveals our thoughts, moods, and memories as clearly as an X-ray reveals our bones. We can actually observe a person's brain registering a joke or experiencing a painful memory." Uhm, no you can't. The fact she states that there are differences between a 'gay' and 'straight' brain are ridiculous. The quote you provided above also shows a huge pitfall. She suggests that incomplete pruning leads to savants, and too much leads to Downs Syndrome. Uhhh, sorry Miss Carter but Downs syndrome is a result of genetics that affect a number of things besides the brain itself. Savantism occurs mostly in children who have autistic defects (while the causes of autism are not currently known, researchers are checking for genetic defects). Calling them idiot savants is incredibly not PC as well. After searching around google, yahoo, and even altavista, I cannot find anything else that will back up where she says a child will lose their eidetic memory due to apoptosis. Also it looks like that particular nugget of information was from one of her earlier books (how can you back up a possible false claim without having someone else prove it besides yourself?) A lot of the reviews for the book, while praising its layout of information and ease to understand, several mention how she brings alot of personal bias towards various sociologial issues, makes signifigant leaps to conclusions and while well versed in the matter, makes grave mistakes on a number of topics. Sample reviews:

      http://www.amazon.com/review/R29WBFJ...cm_cr_rdp_perm

      http://www.amazon.com/review/R1BBLDX...cm_cr_rdp_perm

      Lastly, I'll let this article take apart the validity of much of her book.

      http://human-brain.org/mapping.html

      Being 8 years old much of what's said in there may have been believed to be true at the time, but is known now to be different.

      (If people are getting annoyed by the derailing I have no problem creating a new discussion thread or continuing in private messages.)
      Everyone knows what happens in Vegas stays in Vegas, however, few are familiar with the North Vegas slogan: What happens in North Vegas will haunt your dreams forever.

    5. #705
      DreamSlinger The Cusp's Avatar
      Join Date
      Oct 2006
      Location
      Ottawa, Ontario
      Posts
      4,877
      Likes
      647
      DJ Entries
      192
      Quote Originally Posted by Croneus View Post
      The first line of the summary says it all: "Today a brain scan reveals our thoughts, moods, and memories as clearly as an X-ray reveals our bones. We can actually observe a person's brain registering a joke or experiencing a painful memory."

      Uhm, no you can't.
      Yes you can.

      (from this article: http://www.wired.com/medtech/health/...urrentPage=all)
      "Yet academic researchers and medical entrepreneurs are already trying to sell brain scanning to both patients and corporate clients. Media giant Viacom (parent of MTV and Nickelodeon) paid a reported $200,000 to the British company Neurosense to help determine ad placement by scanning subjects as they watch different TV commercials."

    6. #706
      Member Lois Lane's Avatar
      Join Date
      Feb 2007
      Gender
      Location
      Western NC
      Posts
      9
      Likes
      0
      I've been trying to understand this whole NS/DW thing as well, and as far as I can tell, certain people need their dreams to be more interesting, and others need to feel they have special talents...

      From what I've gathered... NS/DW are real people? And if you piss them off in your daily interactions with them, either at work or on-line, they will teach you a big fat lesson by invading your dreams and throwing an Oogie Boogie on you...

      And the DWs will defend you...?

      So the NSs are just bullies from what I can tell, knowing how easily dreams can be construed to mean anything, considering that dreams often reveal subconscious fears and anxieties... they're counting on your mind running away with you...

      I don't know what my point is, except to say that people who feel the need to exert power over others that are naturally curious/ready to believe is the oldest trick in the book. Every book I've ever read.

    7. #707
      Dream Worm Croneus's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jun 2008
      Gender
      Location
      Vegas baby!
      Posts
      70
      Likes
      1

      Smile

      Quote Originally Posted by The Cusp View Post
      Yes you can.

      (from this article: http://www.wired.com/medtech/health/...urrentPage=all)
      "Yet academic researchers and medical entrepreneurs are already trying to sell brain scanning to both patients and corporate clients. Media giant Viacom (parent of MTV and Nickelodeon) paid a reported $200,000 to the British company Neurosense to help determine ad placement by scanning subjects as they watch different TV commercials."

      Dude the article itself shoots down the whole theoy. Example

      "He puts down his pen and turns to me. "I would love to see your brain healthier, because you'll be happier if it's healthier," he says. "It's too low in activity. I recommend a multivitamin, and to get better blood flow I would take gingko." Just before I leave, he advises me to lay off the snowboarding and play more tennis. "With the lowered activity in your cerebellum," he explains, "I'd like to see you do more coordination sports."

      "There's a logical fallacy here." I am sitting at a conference table with a perfect view of the sun setting over West LA, talking to Robert Rubin, professor and vice chair of psychiatry at UCLA and one of Amen's chief critics.

      My Spect scans are arrayed between us, and I have just recounted Amen's interpretation of my brain images.

      Rubin, a noted researcher on brain functioning in depression, draws two circles on a sheet of paper. He points to the first and says, "Let's say this represents a bunch of people with low activity of the frontal lobe, and let's say, for the sake of argument, that many of them also have depression." Then he points to the second circle. "And here are all the people without depression. Do any of these people also have low frontal lobe activity? You bet they do. So there are people with depression who have this finding, and people without depression with this finding. How is the finding helpful?"

      "Not too helpful," I say. "But Amen claims that studies have shown that low frontal lobe activity is associated with depression."

      Rubin smiles while shaking his head. I can tell this is an argument he's heard before. "That's true, but the data is based on group averages. A typical study will image 10 people with depression and 10 people without depression. On average, you might find that the depressed group has lower frontal activity than the normal group. But there's a lot of variability, meaning some depressed people have normal scans and some healthy people have abnormal scans."

      "Meaning ... you can't use the finding to make a diagnosis."

      "Right." He looks back down at my scans, with all their dings and dents. "To determine the utility of these findings, you have to go to the critical next step, which is to come up with specific imaging criteria for depression, scan a large number of people, and then read the scans blindly — that is, without having met the patient. You can then determine the accuracy of your test. To my knowledge, nobody has done such studies for depression or for most any psychiatric disorder other than Alzheimer's disease."


      and the very last bit of the entire article...

      "Most neuromarketers are using these scans as a way of sprinkling glitter over their products, so that customers will be persuaded that the pictures are giving them a deeper understanding of their mind. In fact, imaging technologies are still in their infancy. And while overenthusiastic practitioners may try to leapfrog over the science, real progress, which will take decades, will be made by patient and methodical researchers, not by entrepreneurs looking to make a buck."


      Nightstalkers are fakes.
      Everyone knows what happens in Vegas stays in Vegas, however, few are familiar with the North Vegas slogan: What happens in North Vegas will haunt your dreams forever.

    8. #708
      Member
      Join Date
      Jun 2008
      Gender
      Location
      Mississippi
      Posts
      7
      Likes
      0
      I somehow managed to sit through this. I cannot help but put my two cents worth in that.. this is bullshit, close the thread and please start one about icecream. Or let the RPG you are trying to create here die.. GG and +1 strength!

    9. #709
      Emotionally unsatisfied. Sandform's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jul 2007
      Gender
      Location
      Texas
      Posts
      4,298
      Likes
      24
      Quote Originally Posted by Croneus View Post
      Sorry to drag it off topic again but...

      The first line of the summary says it all: "Today a brain scan reveals our thoughts, moods, and memories as clearly as an X-ray reveals our bones. We can actually observe a person's brain registering a joke or experiencing a painful memory." Uhm, no you can't. The fact she states that there are differences between a 'gay' and 'straight' brain are ridiculous. The quote you provided above also shows a huge pitfall. She suggests that incomplete pruning leads to savants, and too much leads to Downs Syndrome. Uhhh, sorry Miss Carter but Downs syndrome is a result of genetics that affect a number of things besides the brain itself. Savantism occurs mostly in children who have autistic defects (while the causes of autism are not currently known, researchers are checking for genetic defects). Calling them idiot savants is incredibly not PC as well. After searching around google, yahoo, and even altavista, I cannot find anything else that will back up where she says a child will lose their eidetic memory due to apoptosis. Also it looks like that particular nugget of information was from one of her earlier books (how can you back up a possible false claim without having someone else prove it besides yourself?) A lot of the reviews for the book, while praising its layout of information and ease to understand, several mention how she brings alot of personal bias towards various sociologial issues, makes signifigant leaps to conclusions and while well versed in the matter, makes grave mistakes on a number of topics. Sample reviews:

      http://www.amazon.com/review/R29WBFJ...cm_cr_rdp_perm

      http://www.amazon.com/review/R1BBLDX...cm_cr_rdp_perm

      Lastly, I'll let this article take apart the validity of much of her book.

      http://human-brain.org/mapping.html

      Being 8 years old much of what's said in there may have been believed to be true at the time, but is known now to be different.

      (If people are getting annoyed by the derailing I have no problem creating a new discussion thread or continuing in private messages.)
      First off I have no clue why that is really into this, all the person making the synopsis meant when she said this was that you can see areas of higher activity in the mind, this is what is known as brain mapping. If you couldn't tell things by localizing differences during specific moments then we wouldn't know what pieces of the brain are good for what. The point of the statement is that the mind is modular and they have proven it.

      No it isn't ridiculous, she was citing someone else's work in which he took the brains of a whole bunch of prisoners that were known gay or straight and viewed the differences in their brains. He proposed that the areas that the brains (in a specific part which I can't recall) had in relation to the sex would be the same in homosexual men as that of women. Any claims she made she wasn't making for herself, but making observations about another persons work. She even made sure to note that the facts don't necessarily mean anything because many of the men died of AIDS.


      http://jcn.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/16/6/438 2001 This one states the various chemicals associated with downs syndrome and with apoptosis inhibotory chemicals.
      http://brain.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/...ll/127/12/2572 2004 This one states the various chemicals associated with Autistic cases and with reduction of inhibitory chemicals related to apoptosis.

      Don't you think programmed cell death probably is determined by genetics...like down syndrome?

      P.S. Sorry I can't provide more up to date links but I'm busy atm.


      The people who reviewed her book must not have realized that everything she said was based on inference from mostly other peoples work...and
      almost every time she said something she made it clear that what she was giving you a generalized view, and not a specific view. The book was catering to those less familiar with the subject. Many of them say she makes claims without reproducable experiments, because she speaks of only one, but what she is doing is telling you inferences from specific experiments, not necessarily saying it is college textbook information.

      When I was reading it and she brought about things that other people are saying she said as "fact" I was thinking of it as theory, since she provided the reasons why she thought what she thought. Theory being in terms of a common persons word not a scientists.

      I can't find anything about apoptosis and photographic memory either, however I have found various articles stating for a fact that some children do have eiditic memory and more often than not lose it.
      Last edited by Sandform; 06-18-2008 at 01:47 AM.

    10. #710
      DreamSlinger The Cusp's Avatar
      Join Date
      Oct 2006
      Location
      Ottawa, Ontario
      Posts
      4,877
      Likes
      647
      DJ Entries
      192
      Quote Originally Posted by Anon View Post
      I somehow managed to sit through this. I cannot help but put my two cents worth in that.. this is bullshit, close the thread and please start one about icecream. Or let the RPG you are trying to create here die.. GG and +1 strength!
      Somebody's wearing his cloak of skepticism +5! Dream on, this thread will outlive all you skeptics.

    11. #711
      Member Tyler's Avatar
      Join Date
      Apr 2008
      Gender
      Location
      North Carolina
      Posts
      1,587
      Likes
      36
      so..Cusp....
      Still having trouble sleeping?
      This shit never happens to me

    12. #712
      Talented Skillless Achievements:
      1 year registered 1000 Hall Points Veteran First Class

      Join Date
      Apr 2007
      Posts
      54
      Likes
      0

      Off Topic

      This thread is going way off topic. People posting about eyes and/or resononce and/or brainscans go to Physics of Dreamsharing. It is made for this discusion.
      Last edited by ubigcow; 06-18-2008 at 05:00 AM.
      Great quest: 4-dimensional dream

    13. #713
      Member Tyler's Avatar
      Join Date
      Apr 2008
      Gender
      Location
      North Carolina
      Posts
      1,587
      Likes
      36
      well im going to bed....
      im begging for a dreamwalker or dreamstalker to come visit my dreams.
      Come on.
      This shit never happens to me

    14. #714
      THE anime nub :D What??Me??'s Avatar
      Join Date
      Jun 2008
      Gender
      Location
      I don't know, but it's cold
      Posts
      281
      Likes
      14
      Still nobody in mine...... Come on people!!!!!!!! What part of I challenge you is not breaking through your tiny dreamwalking heads??!?!?! (Or dreamstalking heads...)
      Last edited by What??Me??; 06-18-2008 at 07:51 PM. Reason: tiny grammar thing

      Quote Originally Posted by Portalboat View Post
      So, that means you'll have boobs bigger then all of theirs combined? Because all of them have pretty big boobs
      Quote Originally Posted by Mario92 View Post
      Now that I'm done shrieking like a little girl, this sounds like fun.

    15. #715
      Member Achievements:
      Made lots of Friends on DV Populated Wall Veteran First Class 5000 Hall Points Referrer Bronze Vivid Dream Journal
      Hukif's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jun 2008
      LD Count
      6584
      Gender
      Location
      México
      Posts
      4,153
      Likes
      1217
      DJ Entries
      126
      Hm... I suppose that challenges should be done in 1 place... and I don't see how a dreamwalker/stalker would get were you live to stalk you <.<

    16. #716
      Member JET73L's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jun 2008
      Gender
      Posts
      854
      Likes
      1
      Ah, so, since this thread is starting to get back on track, does anyone have any answers for my questions (13 posts earlier) or Lois Lane (10 posts earlier)?
      Goals completed since joining: 10 -- Last goal completed: February 17, 2009
      Uncontrolled lucid dreams:23.5--controlled lucid dreams:24.5
      --WILDs:16.5--MILDs:1.5--DILDs:22--DEILDs:8--Quasilucids(do not count):3--
      --LTotMBasic:0--LTotMAdvanced:1--LTotY:0--
      JET73L's dream journal

    17. #717
      Psychiatric Ward WaterSquirrel's Avatar
      Join Date
      Nov 2007
      Gender
      Location
      Everywhere.
      Posts
      84
      Likes
      0
      It is possible that through evolution our brains have harnessed the power of dark energy. This would then explain all inter-human psychic phenomena such as dream sharing and telepathy.

      Has anyone ever thought about it this way before?

    18. #718
      Member Lois Lane's Avatar
      Join Date
      Feb 2007
      Gender
      Location
      Western NC
      Posts
      9
      Likes
      0
      Quote Originally Posted by WaterSquirrel View Post
      It is possible that through evolution our brains have harnessed the power of dark energy. This would then explain all inter-human psychic phenomena such as dream sharing and telepathy.

      Has anyone ever thought about it this way before?
      Hmmm... I would think the the evolutioin of our minds, not the brain exactly.

      I'll have to read that again more slowly.

    19. #719
      Member memeticverb's Avatar
      Join Date
      Apr 2006
      Location
      mi, for now
      Posts
      293
      Likes
      1
      Quote Originally Posted by WaterSquirrel View Post
      It is possible that through evolution our brains have harnessed the power of dark energy. This would then explain all inter-human psychic phenomena such as dream sharing and telepathy.

      Has anyone ever thought about it this way before?
      Yes, and you should post your extended thoughts in the thread on the possible physical explanations of telepathy and dream sharing. I think something close to what you have said is probably true since dark energy is a precondition for the preconditions for life and therefore is connected to us and through us. In m-theory I think this explained in terms of "the bulk" which is a multidimensional field in which two 3-space fields collided to form what only appears to us as 3-dimensions, but is really 10, 11+ dimensions.

      As for dream walkers etc, I cant rule out the possibility that they are "real", but there are some inconsistencies with how they are being approached here. They are probably, as already mentioned, manifestations of our subconscious.

      But this leads right back the the problem of why do so many people "share" the same archetypes for these encounters?

      In my experience I've had reoccurring lucid dream characters exactly like dream stalkers (wearing all black with black top hats and slender metallic weapons) as well as an old lady who was a ghost and who shook my entire dream world. I also had a reoccurring lucid dream character who was a short fat bald goblin-type who was out to get me. In each case except the old lady I was able to defeat the attackers by encompassing them in a force field which i then reduced to the size of a speck of dust. never fails!

      My questions are whether the others who have experienced these types of DCs are lucid when they encounter them, and what scenarios they were in when they appeared to them?

    20. #720
      Member ChaybaChayba's Avatar
      Join Date
      Mar 2008
      Gender
      Location
      Skypedia
      Posts
      1,903
      Likes
      71
      Quote Originally Posted by Croneus View Post
      Basic rundown on how the human eye works.

      Actually, nothing in your eye resonates.
      We completely agree, the only reason why you think we don't, is because you do not understand what resonance is. I can make your eye resonate with sound waves, claiming nothing in your eye resonates is just trying to say B when I say A..
      Quote Originally Posted by WaterSquirrel View Post
      It is possible that through evolution our brains have harnessed the power of dark energy. This would then explain all inter-human psychic phenomena such as dream sharing and telepathy.

      Has anyone ever thought about it this way before?
      I think some scientists already discovered this dark energy (never heard of the term dark energy myself) but, I assume it's the same as orgon energy, or the aether? I don't really believe such a thing as "vacuum" exists, how can "nothing" exist? I think this vacuum lots of people, including science, talk about is actually just another form of energy.. So yeah, I also thought about that, and I read this really elaborated article about this energy and astral projections.. google for Robert Bruce. Anyway, almost all cultures through history over the whole world have talked about this energy, there must be something to it.
      Last edited by ChaybaChayba; 06-22-2008 at 12:16 AM.
      "Reject common sense to make the impossible possible." -Kamina

    21. #721
      Talented Skillless Achievements:
      1 year registered 1000 Hall Points Veteran First Class

      Join Date
      Apr 2007
      Posts
      54
      Likes
      0

      Other's Stories

      This post has four parts. They are seperated by 's.


      I put together other's stories from this thread. I have not had a dreamsharing experiance. (If I had, I would believe in it.) This is all I found, but I skimmed pretty fast.


      Spoiler for delpiero:
      Spoiler for delpiero:
      Spoiler for Lex16:
      Spoiler for Sanzora:
      Spoiler for anomanderis:
      Spoiler for anomanderis:
      Spoiler for AHiddenSaint:
      Spoiler for Nazzul:
      Spoiler for AHiddenSaint:
      Spoiler for AHiddenSaint:
      Spoiler for anomanderis:
      Spoiler for L:
      Spoiler for Xinro:
      Spoiler for themuffinman:
      Spoiler for Aryaxon:
      Spoiler for mathieu:
      Spoiler for Sativa:
      Spoiler for anon1776:
      Spoiler for dorpis:
      Spoiler for spitfire riggz:
      Spoiler for anomanderis:




      Quote Originally Posted by memeticverb View Post
      Yes, and you should post your extended thoughts in the thread on the possible physical explanations of telepathy and dream sharing.
      Thank you. That thread has been posted on by someone who also posted here, but he just spammed about it not being needed and me getting up my post count. It has not been posted on on topic by anyone except me. And for a while (until I saw ChaybaChayba's post) it didn't matter because the spamming on this thread had stopped.



      ChaybaChayba, You posted here about the science of dreamsharing AGAIN. After I posted a link to and instructions to post on Physics of Dreamsharing, and I PMed you specifically telling you not to. As you seem to have a short memory span, here's your post.
      Spoiler for Your post:

      I PMed everyone you were talking to about the same thread, so they should see it and reply to it on that thread. (Unlike you, you useless bent spoon.)



      Quote Originally Posted by ChaybaChayba View Post

      Thank you for posting on the other thread.

      I didn't post about the science of dream sharing, I posted about the science of the eye! And maybe I just didn't read your PM yet, ever thought about that? No need to get all emotional! I'll go read it right now
      ChaybaChayba, I thought you would have read the post on this thread. The PM was sent so that, if you meant to reply to someone's post that was posted before mine but hadn't gotten around to it, you would do it on the other thread. Obviously, you just skipped my post and read WaterSquirrel's post. If your not even reading this thread, don't share your opinion. The reason I didn't specifically chew him out is because he got to the thread after I had posted it. (I think. I don't recall him being on here before. I'm sure he hasn't been posting about the science of the eye or other parts of the science of dreamsharing.)

      And about this not being the science of dreamsharing: If you're just talking about the science of the eye, your way off topic.

      Again, Thank you for posting on the other thread.
      Last edited by ubigcow; 06-22-2008 at 01:56 AM.
      Great quest: 4-dimensional dream

    22. #722
      Member ChaybaChayba's Avatar
      Join Date
      Mar 2008
      Gender
      Location
      Skypedia
      Posts
      1,903
      Likes
      71
      I didn't post about the science of dream sharing, I posted about the science of the eye! And maybe I just didn't read your PM yet, ever thought about that? No need to get all emotional! I'll go read it right now
      "Reject common sense to make the impossible possible." -Kamina

    23. #723
      Member JET73L's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jun 2008
      Gender
      Posts
      854
      Likes
      1
      Since I still haven;t recieved answers, and the thread's been off topic long enough that my original post isn;t noticed, I'm re-posting the unanswered questions (to do with the original subjects of Nightstalkers/Dream walkers, NOT about eyes or brain scans):
      1.is there any way to differentiate between a NS/DW and a regular dream character?
      2.If you regularly meet sentient-seeming dream characters who do not conform to any of your own dream styloes, are they likely dream walkers, or merely dream characters?
      3.Are these actively encountered beings, have people here actually had proven dreams where they encountered a DW/NS that they later met in real life and confirmed the dream encounter, or is this purely theoretical, based on occurences in dreams unproven IRL?
      Goals completed since joining: 10 -- Last goal completed: February 17, 2009
      Uncontrolled lucid dreams:23.5--controlled lucid dreams:24.5
      --WILDs:16.5--MILDs:1.5--DILDs:22--DEILDs:8--Quasilucids(do not count):3--
      --LTotMBasic:0--LTotMAdvanced:1--LTotY:0--
      JET73L's dream journal

    24. #724
      Talented Skillless Achievements:
      1 year registered 1000 Hall Points Veteran First Class

      Join Date
      Apr 2007
      Posts
      54
      Likes
      0
      Sorry, I was going to post this before, but I was making another thread. (Basically, I forgot.)

      Read the fourth story (by Sanzora) and the fourteenth (by themuffinman) in my post above to help answer your third question and the fifth story (by anomanderis) and the sixth story (by anomanderis) to help answer your first question.

      Quote Originally Posted by The Cusp View Post
      Ok, this thread has been sucking lately, so lets try something new.

      You post any dreams you think might be NS encounters in as much detail as possible here, and I'll tell you if it was just a regular dream or really a Night Stalker.
      After this post, some people wrote their dreams on the forum and he, using criteria that is unknown to me, said whether they were probably shared dreams or not. He may rate yours if you post them here. You could still look at the ones he rated and compare them to yours.

      I don't know much about shared dreaming, so I just direct you to the people who do. The answer to your first question is probably "yes". (I know, you want to know how: I have no idea. I might look back through the thread and see what other people have said.) I have no idea about your second question. labmonkeywork has posted about reoccuring shared dreams, however, so you can search for posts by him on this thread to find other stuff to compare your dreams to. And your third question: people claim to have proven dream sharing. No one has convinced science as a whole that dreamsharing is possible, but they have convinced sections of the scientific community. Basically, if you believe them, ya; if you don't believe them, no.
      Last edited by ubigcow; 06-26-2008 at 05:05 AM.
      Great quest: 4-dimensional dream

    25. #725
      DreamSlinger The Cusp's Avatar
      Join Date
      Oct 2006
      Location
      Ottawa, Ontario
      Posts
      4,877
      Likes
      647
      DJ Entries
      192
      I've tried explaining my unknown criteria before, but nobody seems to be getting it. So let me try again...

      People are right when they say NS can't hurt you since it's your dream, but what they can do is use you dream against you.

      Say we met in a dream and I attacked you from behind with a sword which you didn't see. It likely wouldn't have much effect. Even just as straight up attack that you did see coming probably wouldn't do much.

      But if I yelled to you to get your attention, then used that same sword to cleave some giant rocks or smash some buildings in a dramatic display, I could implant the suggestion into your dream that my sword is indeed powerful. At this point it becomes part of your dream, and now has power over you. Perhaps I would hack a few helpless DCs and lick their blood from the sword to further reinforce the idea in your mind.

      That type of behavior is characteristic of NS, and they find creative ways to use it. Maneuvers like that are their main weapon, and actual attacks are much less important. Normal DCs don't have that kind of mastery.
      Last edited by The Cusp; 06-26-2008 at 08:40 PM.

    Page 29 of 40 FirstFirst ... 19 27 28 29 30 31 39 ... LastLast

    Bookmarks

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •