 Originally Posted by Oneironaut
So basically, what you're saying is; if you have seen enough evidence to think that something doesn't add up (even though you don't have concrete proof to prove the claim beyond a reasonable doubt), then you should shut your mouth? No offense, but I think that kind of nationalist censorship is more dangerous to the "good people of America" (and free-thinkers across the globe) than simply presenting your own opinion that "something just doesn't add up" and encouraging people to look at the facts more closely to decide for themselves.
I also think the practice of allowing the government to shepherd you through life - without questioning the motives and ethics of those in power - is quite possibly the most damaging "mind virus" to ever be implanted on the people of this nation. People have the right to question any and all actions of their government (and/or its military, for that matter). This kind of "hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil (if it has to do with government)" ideology has more to do with manipulation than patriotism. Even if 9/11 was neither an inside job, nor allowed to happen, to discourage people from looking over the incident - and surrounding factors - themselves is basically akin to saying: "Thinking for yourself hurts your country. Sit down, shut up, and let your government think for you." It is a stance of Nationalism over the quest for truth, and just not something I will ever endorse.
Just my two cents, but I could see how his position would irritate someone with your perspective.
I don't think you understand "my perspective," as if there are only two distinct perspectives here. Why are you assuming that because I oppose a ridiculous conspiracy theory that I am overly nationalistic? That because I'm not naive enough to to be sucked into such an emotionally charged premise, that I am automatically a champion of the government, censoring all free thinking challengers and enabling the corrupt politicians to do their worst to the defenseless people of America. That's what I live for! Do you think that as a "free thinking American," I should have to lend credence to every nutjob who creates a fantastic conspiracy to fill that gaping void in his life? Should I aquiesce with his overpowering need to feel important and tolerate his polluting the minds of the impressionable young children who watch public television? Or as a "free thinking American," should I have the capacity to recognize a senseless, unjustified, and utterly baseless act of slander against the government and feel compelled to speak out against such acts? As a free thinking American with a truly objective philosophy on such matters, that would be the conscionable think to do.
I never said that 9/11 conspiracy theorists should be censored, but you can be damn sure that when they go on talk shows and spout their bullshit, I will forward all due criticism in their direction. Do you not realize the implications of their claims? Is it not fair to hold them to the highest standards of scientific analysis? If they were really free thinking, they would be open to all perspectives, they would be open and accepting of the fact that they could be wrong. They wouldn't go to fanatical ends to justify their own perspective while ignoring all evidence to the contrary, no matter how damning. That is undeniably the case with 99% of the "truther" population. Undeniably. That includes the movement's leaders and there is video proof of that. Any person with a semi-objective conscience can see that none of their claims stand up in the face of scientific scrutiny, not one. And they have been publicly subjected to intense and thorough scientific scrutiny on at least one occasion that I have witnessed from a credible source (and there are more that I have not looked at.) Unsurprisingly they failed miserably, many times and in all cases. A movement like that doesn't deserve the light of day. They aren't innocently "asking you to investigate for yourself." They are putting on the guise of an honest, truth seeking movement while covertly infecting you with a disease that they aren't even aware they possess themselves. The main reason these things gain momentum is because when they encourage young people to "investigate," they will be inevitably led to the multitude of factually deficient, factually dishonest, and intentionally misleading websites that exist on the internet. Not that Charlie Sheen is aware of this, infectious memes go about spreading themselves without the conscious awareness of their host, just like a real virus. They would otherwise die out quickly.
The most irritating aspect was that he did it on the Jimmy Kimmel show. It would be much less irritating if he did it in a private forum, or on the internet, or even on the street. Just not on public television where ususpecting viewers are unwillingly subjected to such travesties of scientific integrity.
*Marks end of rant*
|
|
Bookmarks