Thread: Why is dreamviews more liberal than society at large?

Originally Posted by flipsyde

Cmind. I'm a liberal not a libertarian. Ron Paul is a libertarian. I do not support him, but he is totally anti-state.

Not really, although compared to almost every other politician, he's pretty close to anti-state. But he isn't really associated with the modern Tea Party.

Originally Posted by flipsyde

But the teaparty misuses it. Rich getting richer and poor getting poorer is not what the Sons of Liberty had in mind. Also, they are all dead and were in a totally different time period. Bringing them up at this point is almost irrelevant.

The Tea Party are too disparate to make generalizations.

As for the Sons of Liberty, they lived before the notion of state welfare even existed. To them, the idea of a state stealing money from ANY group of people to give to another group would have been deplorable. It was actually Marx in the late 19th century that started that idea.

History is very relevant. You'll understand this when you get a little older.

Originally Posted by flipsyde

I never said he was associated with that party. You sound like a republican although i can't say for sure since I have no idea. The reason they are a powerful party is because they are masters of deception. Just like how you twist my every word. Let us see how you do it this time.

I'm an anarchist, but not the socialist kind. The libertarian kind.