 Originally Posted by PhilosopherStoned
This is already happening with fish for aquariums. They look tacky as hell. If we can't ban it on the grounds of bio-ethics then I'm going to hold out hopes for banning it on the grounds of good taste.
I always thought that would look cool. You could have a glowing fish aquarium next to your bed. Nice, calm blue light. What's wrong with that?
Also, I don't think these ideas are too far out of our realm of moral judgement.
You just have to think about what it actually is. You're just using a set of identical genes basically.
Choosing a sperm which is not going to produce a sick human is obviously a good thing, anyone who has qualms with that is guaranteed to be religious.
What if, somehow, you chose a sperm to implant which was exactly the same as a previous human?
Would that be, even though it's the same as cloning, "wrong" too?
I wouldn't clone my dog. At least, I probably wouldn't, thinking about it now. But who knows when he's gone what I would want.
I just think there is some rationality it letting things go. Whether that be objects or living organisms.
Also, the only problem I can see with cloning a human, and why it is different from cloning another animal is that humans can talk.
The clone would eventually find out that it is a clone. How would that make him or her feel?
|
|
Bookmarks