Thread: Neuroscientists reconstruct voice from internal dialogue

Originally Posted by tommo

Why not? Thinking is a LOT more efficient when you don't have to speak every measly thing you're thinking about.
So, there YOU do again, assuming people will not use this in a beneficial way.
You're seriously arguing the dumbest fucking things recently.

Your statement is still just as impenetrably bizarre and unfounded, sorry. Cognitive neuroscience is nowhere near developed enough to tell if what you're saying even makes any sense, let alone is true.

The assumption that thought isn't actually based on language, the assumption that if it isn't then it's totally disposable, the assumption that a purely representational language faculty would somehow 'slow down' thought, again the assumption that such a faculty actually functions when not speaking... I don't have any clue why you think these are solid assumptions. But you seem convinced that what you're saying is totally well-founded and sensible.