Okay, I am going to attempt to translate Mr. DiMeglio's rantings. He said:

Mass/energy/force (middle gravity and middle inertia) is equivalently expressed as (middle) length/distance in/of space. Gravity and inertia are key to distance in/of space.

All of what I have demonstrated in this post manifests in/as dream experience. We are semi-immobilized in dreams, and that is half inertia.

The baby grows at/from the center of the body, and that is half gravity.

Dreams involve a fundamental integration AND spreading of being, experience (and space), and thought at the [gravitational] mid-range of feeling between thought and sensory experience.

Dreams make thought more like sensory experience in general.

I have demonstrated the fundamental unification of physics in/as dream experience.

This is just one small passage. I will try to find some sense in it.

1. Why does he say "mass/energy/force" instead of using one word? This may be because he finds that commonly accepted language distorts true understanding. Perhaps he finds using common language simply reinforces common misunderstanding. Perhaps he is trying to create a hybrid language that bypasses common understanding and delivers the open-minded reader into a more open and flexible perception of the world.

2. He then parenthetically adds "(middle gravity and middle inertia)" to the already awkward phrase "mass/energy/force". Perhaps this is significant also. No classically trained physicist knows what "middle gravity" is. There is no commonly accepted conception of this phrase. Well, what if DiMeglio is on to something? What if there is a realm of reality that is not what we consider "full gravity"? What if the dream world actually IS "half-gravity"?

3. DiMeglio says "We are semi-immobilized in dreams, and that is half inertia." This is obviously true to any student of dream science. We are physically immobilized while dreaming. He is telling us that this meets his definition of "half-inertia". While dreaming we are half conscious, half immobilized.

4. We grow from embryos. The embyo is at the midpoint of the mother. This is obvious, but maybe it has a deeper significance than we realized. DiMeglio says this is "half-gravity". He really is trying to relate to the world that we know and help us connect to his perspective.

5. He says that dreams are at the midpoint between thought and sensory experience. This is not so farfetched. Dreams are at the midpoint of awakeness and something, but what is the something? He says it is thought. Nobody knows what thought is. Maybe DiMeglio is on to something. He says that dreams are a bridge between what we think (our desires?) and what we sense. Perhaps he is explaining how dreams become reality.

6. "Dreams make thought more like sensory experience in general." = Dreams evolve us into the next phase of being.

7. "I have demonstrated the fundamental unification of physics in/as dream experience." = Dreams are real. Dreams are part of physics. Dreams are the way our desires (thoughts) are manifested into physical reality.

Does any of this make DeMeglios rants a little more understandable?

JJ