I know it's not core to the thread's purpose, but I really have to argue against your ideas about pain. Maybe there is potential for a better system to exist, but I think that giving us a sense that something is "wrong" but it isn't as intrusive or can simply be ignored is a very poor model to run off of for survival. Pain is not merely a hindrance. Your ideas about it seem to rely heavily on the assumption that we will always be civilized and that society doesn't have a chance of failing, and in a way it also assumes that children can and do have the perspective of adults when it comes to pain.
Let's start with my point about children. If pain were merely a signal that alerts us to something, but it isn't intrusive, bad, or downright what we experience as painful, how would children effectively learn to be safe? They would depend on role models and mentors entirely when it comes to learning safe practices, which assumes there will always be a role model or mentor. Teenagers, for instance, even with pain being as powerful of a deterrent as it is, still engage in very risky behavior. Employ your suggested system of pain and imagine the results. Children only know not to touch the stove again after doing the it the first time and experiencing pain and a lasting burn. They don't need to be told over and over not to touch it if they actually wind up touching one. Your system allows curiosity and desire to trump doing something that can destroy your body and even kill you. People also like to do things they are told not to, the whole forbidden fruit thing. The only reason people don't wind up doing things that are guaranteed or have a very high risk of causing them pain when told not to (as they get older) is because they already know how much they dislike pain and how awful it is. Ignoring all this, if you start with a clean slate and have to learn everything about getting hurt yourself, the danger everything poses cannot possibly be understood without a previous understanding of what dangerous actions can result. You are set up, in that case, to fail. The only thing that we know of that can bridge the gap of that lack of understanding is the discomfort pain causes.
The bit about society possibly failing is also tied into the concept about children. We could regress so far that we wind up having to learn to do things by ourselves again by simple experience, and without anyone to teach us anything. Not only that, but we wouldn't have the medical prowess, nor the technology to correct whatever issues come up as a result of this essentially impact-less system of pain you propose. Humans are honestly barely out of the jungle, and society is incredibly fragile. It's a big mistake to assume things will always be good enough that we can afford to make pain essentially painless, and simply have it as a somewhat annoying pop up that we can simply dismiss. A better system is actually one we already use--drugs. We can interrupt pain signals (opioids), interfere with the ability to sense pain at all (dissociative anesthetics), and even simply induce an unconscious state to get through the pain (anesthetics, etc.). Better yet, we can't simply abuse this system and use it whenever we want--withdrawal effects or other complications (cognitive deficits that take possibly weeks to go away, as with dissociatives) prevent us from being able to engage in every risky behavior we simply feel like because we can simply make the pain go away. And that there is the biggest issue with doing away with pain as we know it: as with just about everything humans do, we will take things too far. It would be far too easy to engage in risky behavior, simply because the only downside is possibly losing your limbs, being maimed, or death. That, and the prolonged inability to function properly as a result of the number of broken bones and everything that will go up as a result of this reduced punishment for being risky. Making it easy to forgo safety is just a bad idea.
|
|
Bookmarks