I've stayed out of this 'debate' for quite some time just because I've decided to sit back and watch the discussion evolve - mostly to see where everyone is coming from. Obviously I'm for drug discussion and whatnot, but if the admins decide to take it away then they take it away. Some excellent points have been made, but I see where the staff comes from; I think overall it's a 'better safe than sorry' kinda thing.

I'll be disappointed if discussion is taken away just because there were so many individuals here (who had experience with psychadelics) who really made me think. Drug discussion was something I really enjoyed about DV, not because I could openly talk about my own personal experience but because I could read others. I really learned a lot from some of the things I read, and it'll be unfortunate if this makes some of the members I truly respect leave.

That being said, I know that most of the staff and some of the people in favour of limited drug discussion have had experience, and that they're just trying to make everyone understand why this is being done, not that this is necessarily their choice. Either way, I see where they're coming from and I think it's pointless arguing, whatever decision is made is made. Hopefully I can find a drug discussing forum as insightful as the threads we had going on here.

Anyways, my two cents... and once again I'm in the middle ground of a debate.