Quote Originally Posted by Universal Mind View Post
I talked about that in one of my former dead horse conversations with Mystic in one of the 9/11 threads. How does the claim about corruption with a few individuals in a domestic investigation agency prove that the war in Iraq has nothing to do with anti-terrorism strategy? How does it prove that the Hussein regime was not a threat and did not violate our ceasefire on terrorism grounds for 12 years? How does it prove the irrelevance of democracy?
missing the point. the FBI agents who were corrupt occupied very high offices, and are still being protected by the highest offices by executive order only.

if Sibel Edmonds is correct, agents within the FBI, protected by the highest authorities, aided the 9/11 hijackers.

Riggs Bank, ran by none other than Bush's uncle, was also found guilty of money laundering to two of the 9/11 hijackers. further investigation of the corruption of this terrorist-supporting bank has of course been blocked by president bush by executive order

see shadows in a cave