Quote Originally Posted by memeticverb View Post
missing the point. the FBI agents who were corrupt occupied very high offices, and are still being protected by the highest offices by executive order only.

if Sibel Edmonds is correct, agents within the FBI, protected by the highest authorities, aided the 9/11 hijackers.

Riggs Bank, ran by none other than Bush's uncle, was also found guilty of money laundering to two of the 9/11 hijackers. further investigation of the corruption of this terrorist-supporting bank has of course been blocked by president bush by executive order

see shadows in a cave
the point is that most terrorism is staged. False flag events are being used and have been used for a long time. This is a fact.

That the terrorists who attacked the U.S. couldnt have done it without support withing the U.S. govt is a fact.

That neither you nor any intelligence agency could prove that Bin Laden was responsible for 9/11, or that Iraq was either, is also fact.

so lets see, your argument seems to be:

1. There are SOME terrorists willing to commit random suicide attacks, and even though they have never been established in Iraq, we should stay and spend billions of U.S. dollars on a war in Iraq.

genious. what astounding reasoning. did i miss something?