That'd be a bit easier to believe if he'd actually provided some evidence instead of linking to an unrelated video, wouldn't it? |
|
That basically means: I know you're right, and I'm too up my own ass to acknowledge that, so I'm just going to throw in whatever provokes you because my immaturity levels are blooming. |
|
That'd be a bit easier to believe if he'd actually provided some evidence instead of linking to an unrelated video, wouldn't it? |
|
I don't think you understand scientific method, so let me spell it out for you: you make an observation, you create a hypothesis, you make a prediction, you test your hypothesis (multiple times), and you draw a conclusion. You meticulously document the entire process, and then you publish your findings in hopes that other scientists can replicate your results. Once the results have been replicated by enough other scientists, the findings may become a scientific theory. Honestly you should brush up on your high school science education because you've done nothing so far but make a fool of yourself. |
|
You said that my asking for evidence is the same thing as saying "you are right and I am wrong", which apparently makes sense in your world, remember? |
|
Last edited by Xei; 03-28-2011 at 06:17 PM.
A video on quantum physics does not explain or prove telekinesis. Why? Because it explains quantum physics, not telekinesis. Unless you can show me, with a credible source, that there is some practical application of quantum physics that can be used to perform or prove telekinesis, you have proven nothing. |
|
Well if I didn't understand the complete scientific method, I do now! Thanks buddy. |
|
Yeah you should know that that 'documentary' is a piece of propaganda and cites various pieces of demonstrated scientific fraud. |
|
The water molecule thing for one turned out to be fraud. |
|
Like I said, your is head is way too high in the clouds to acknowledge it. He's already provided evidence. Glad to see you like backing me up. |
|
Last edited by Xei; 03-28-2011 at 06:31 PM. Reason: dont' double post please
Scientific method has nothing to do with this topic? How else are you going to prove telekinesis/pyrokinesis right or wrong? I think it has everything to do with this topic, and the fact that you feel that it doesn't speaks volumes about how ignorant you are. Also, why should I, the negative, have to prove to you that telekinesis is not real? The burden of proof is left on the positive, which are you and LucidJuggalo. |
|
Xei was playing a joke on Will1. At the beginning of the thread, he refused to provide evidence and told everyone to go find it for themselves. Xei was simply doing the same thing but doing so through a quote rather than bluntly stating "find the proof for my argument yourself," like Will1 did. I find it laughable you would get angry at Xei for this but not Will1. |
|
I think the select phrase is 'rank hypocrisy and bias'? |
|
The theory of scientific method has nothing to do with this topic. This topic has nothing to do with proving it real, therefore scientific method wouldn't be utilized, correct? |
|
Bookmarks