 Originally Posted by shadowofwind
Then about 3 years ago, I started getting a lot of accurate premonitions in dreams. I'd had some of these before, and had explained them away as coincidences, extrapolation from previous experience, etc. But it got to where I was getting them pretty much every night, in ways that I could objectively demonstrate. Then these evolved beyond mere predictions, and I had a few that produced miraculous events in waking life. Unlike with the premonitions, I chose to just accept those at face value, because I didn't want to risk the consequences of an escalating series of 'proofs'. I also had a fair number of experiences where my thoughts influenced other people's dreams, and vice versa, in a verifiable manner. Now, for the past several months, all of this has mostly stopped, and I'm back to having 'normal' vivid dreams every night.
If astral projection is so verifiable, then why has it failed to be verified in the past? Is there something special about your 'astral' experiences? Are you able to induce these experiences again in a testable manner? Also, keep in mind that your results may have been skewed by confirmation bias and that they may in part be the result of random chance. It's relatively easy to influence people's dreams. Our subconscious minds pick up on that stuff all the time when we interact with other people. And last, unfortunately, I cannot take one person's experiences as proof of the existence of projection onto an astral plane. These results have to be shared among all astral projectors (and if they are, then this begs the question, if these phenomena are so common, why can't you prove it?). I don't mean to offend, but there is also a chance that you are delusional.
Revisiting the 'astral projection' issue, I see that my dismissal of it as 'all in my head' was not actually rational based on the information I had. Yes, I was correct that moving my 'astral' body involved manipulating a mental model of where my body was. But it doesn't follow that something being a mental model makes it 'unreal' in an astral sense.
Actually, on the contrary, there is no reason to believe that this is taking place on an astral plane. If your brain is completely capable of "manipulating a mental model" of where your body is, in addition to creating the sensory input of those experiences, then why would you go to the length of assuming it is taking place on the astral? Your brain is completely capable of producing any range of experiences, as I have repeatedly explained on this thread.
As for your reference to Occam's razor, it is the sole reason why you should not believe in an astral plane. If there is a simpler model that explains your experiences in their entirety (the phenomenon of lucid dreaming), then it is unnecessary and flawed to go the extra step and assert that an astral plane exists. Sure, we don't know everything about how the imagination works, but that doesn't mean we can jump to conclusions or simply refuse to make a conclusion. We don't know everything about the brain, but we do have good, scientifically supported paradigms that we can use to explain these types of experiences.
More generally, Occam's razor does not say anything about the likelihood of astral realms or the like, because human experience isn't actually adequately explained by current ideas about the 'physical' realm. The 'simplest' explanation for astral phenomena may involve finer states of matter or it might not. But we can't say, because we lack even the barest sketch of a real theory in either case.
No, because Occam's razor is a principle. It wasn't created to describe the likelihood of astral realms. However, when we apply that principle, the logical conclusion is that these experiences are simply lucid dreams. No need for astral bullshit. It is fallacious to assume that an astral plane exists in the first place, since a simpler model using lucid dreams to explain your experiences can be used just fine.
I've continued to speculate that there is actually no 'astral' matter, and that the paranormal experiences that I've had can be explained in terms of unknown non-local interactions involving 'ordinary' matter. This is speculation though, and at the moment I'm leaning slightly towards there being astral matter.
Speculation on what the astral plane consists of, based on speculation that the astral plane actually exists.
In regards to the experience of 'astral projection', I don't think it can realistically be characterized as an especially vivid lucid dream. I can't prove that - and unlike my premonitions and poltergeist-type experiences, I have no objective evidence at all. But if you astrally project, I think you have to agree that there's an element there that's quite different. Many of my 'lucid' dreams have been as vivid as waking life, with my visual field being the same except for degraded peripheral vision. But those dreams are still not very much like the 'astral projection' experience. Astral projection involves moving something that isn't moved during those other dreams. I can't prove that, because I know it from feeling it move, and I can't make you know what I can feel, or demonstrate it in a scientifically rigorous manner. But that doesn't make what I am aware of utterly pretend or untrustworthy either.
How do you know that this 'extra element' isn't simply created by your mind? We can go round and round about how there's some different, special element present in astral projection, but there's always the distinct possibility that this is simply your mind's representation of astral projection. You have no grounds to believe that there is an astral or external plane involved, other than basing this belief on profoundly convincing subjective experiences. As I have re-reiterated before, your mind can create any array of experiences, and add any extra 'element' or 'feel' to whatever you're experiencing.
I share your skepticism that 'astral' experience can tell a person very much about most things.
When did I ever say this? Lucid dreams can certainly be profound and can reveal quite a lot of useful, subconsciously retained information.
And the 'characters' in my dreams, as far as I know, are never anything 'more' than dream characters, whatever that may mean exactly.
Cool. I believe there's a definition of DC somewhere on this site; essentially, they are entities created by your subconscious mind.
But I do experience a formless entity which I know is not merely a resident of my imagination, because it can do stuff outside of my imagination. I don't control it, so I can't prove its existence in a scientific manner by setting up repeatable experiments. But ask it a question, if you want to, about something of philosophical importance to you that you are trying to understand, and it will answer you. If it answers you in a dream tonight and you don't understand the answer, post your answer or send me a private message and I think I can probably help interpret it for you.
It can do stuff outside of your imagination? Really, now? You're going to have a tough time convincing me of that. I bet if I had a lucid dream tonight I could create a formless DC that I could program to do things that are seemingly outside of my imagination. Shit, it's not unreasonable that your neurons can fire off randomly to create new thoughts and concepts.
I don't think that I'll be asking any philosophical questions tonight, bud. I am fully aware of my subconscious brain's power to reveal profound, cryptic information. How about you prove astral projection first?
|
|
Bookmarks