Ah, not many experiments posted, uh? Also, there is a big flaw on the experiment on the first post, since people will be at the start in a lab, there is high changes they will dream about the lab, and thus, the chance of both dreamers dreaming about that is, incredibly high.
Another flaw, if you assume that a lab will show a shared dream as it will a normal dream, it will fail, because if shared dreams are real, then it is an unexplored thing and thus we can't make assumptions out of it.
Anyway, I was thinking, first, collect a bunch of people with really good recall, we don't really need many LDers for this, only people with good recall, who cares where they are from, then put them in a test to see if they aren't lying about the recall.
Take the people that aren't lying, then put them to record their dreams. Have another team of Lucid Dreamers who will try to share dreams with the random people, then journal too, the LD people can't meet the other team, do their journals match? Whats the frequency? Is there a constant frequency?
If yes to all the questions above, continue to next step, if not, repeat over.
Next step, make them have their REM movements saved as data, do their shared dream journals match with the REM movement? Yes, we can conclude that they were dreaming about something really similar, or shared a dream. No? Get them to a brain-activity reading machine.
Knowing that both remember the dream, a SD should affect the brain activity (We can't say for sure it affects REM sleep, which is why it isn't something to repeat the experiment over), do their activity match? Yes, same conclusion as above, no, repeat.
Incredibly condensed form, but the point is to get to know what people you do sync with, because, if somehow SD is related to people having something in common, what if you choose the wrong person? We need a broad number of examples to try on, and do a lot of maths to know when to proceed from journals only, to REM data saving. Note that this would only say it is more provable than not, just as it right now is less provable than yes.
|
|
Bookmarks