If the issue is dependency, then, all the more reason to allow them to legally be sexually active. As long as it's illegal, you'll have more parents which frown upon it. Legalizing it would encourage parental supervision, since parents would no longer feel they were encouraging a crime, by helping their teen children be safely and responsibly sexually active. Of course, I wouldn't expect the more conservative parents to change much. Under your suggestion, parents would share the responsibility of choice if the daughter does end up becoming pregnant, since the daughter is still financially dependent on them. Shouldn't parents, and not the law, be the ultimate deciders of their children's sexual activity, at least while they're in the house? (And then we get into shitty parent hypotheticals, to which I respond in advance: then have mandatory counseling)
However the whole 'adulthood' thing does not compute (unless, again, from the standpoint of financial dependence--but that's covered above with dependency). There are plenty of 16-year-olds with the mental age of an 18-year-old, or even an older adult (conversely, there are many 18-year-olds that have the mental life of a 12 year old... And many irresponsible 18-year-olds, too). In this day and age, there's a rising number of children who are smarter and more responsible than their parents.
So, what's wrong with my solution: make the teens take counseling, and/or a test? We trust them with the lives of infants and adults in cars at 16, so why can't we trust them with a possible (and, if safely planned, over 99% improbable (a fair estimate from the 98% non-breakage claim of properly used condoms, coupled with the difficulties of fertility of the human female to begin with... The percentage is even higher if the girl is on birth control!)) fetus?
|
|
Bookmarks