I do seldomly post - I might add that I also frequently find myself dissenting from UM’s positions; however I must acquiesce my unfamiliarity to him, so I am amenable to any areas where we perhaps agree.

Quote Originally Posted by Denziloe View Post
Okay. Here are the words of Peter Kropotkin, a prominent and seminal anarchist who gave this definition for the Encyclopedia Britannica:

"the name given to a principle of theory of life and conduct under which society is conceived without government - harmony in such a society being obtained, not by submission to law, or by obedience to any authority, but by free agreements concluded between various groups, territorial and professional, freely constituted for the sake of production and consumption, as also for the satisfaction of the infinite variety of the needs and aspirations of a civilized being..."
The definition posted by Denziloe is suffice and the Wikipedia link below provides a rather lettered definition of anarchism as Cmind has posted.

Quote Originally Posted by cmind View Post
Anarchism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I would entirely concur with the need of contextualizing and semantically defining philosophies - or whatever it may be - and everyone seems to desire the same thing. So lets work with the aforementioned definitions and engage in a dialectical conversation regarding anarchism (if anything).