like you mentioned, UM, there are plenty of nutters with guns out there (and there probably will be for some time until we reach the star trek: tng standard of living

). self-defense is a necessary part of the human condition, but some elements of this situation may have been avoidable had we gone about it differently earlier on.
we aren't left with only one choice because there is only one inherent choice - to fight - it's (partly) because of previous activities conducted by our government, and because apparently few people have an incentive to come up with a way to really implement non-violent measures. assuming some level of hostility will be there, we have more than enough military resources at our disposal and could easily make adjustments so that we are more balanced in how we distribute our wealth.
is that reasonable?
Bookmarks