Thread: Pyrokinesis: Possible or impossible?

Of course, it's okay for you not to give sources, and tell people to be open minded, but when other people do it isn't evidence that they're being open minded, it's evidence that they're wrong. ._.

Here you can read about some of the lies in that film:

What the Bleep Do We Know!? - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You appear to have gotten a lot of your misinformation that you stick to, such as the 10% brain thing, from this source. Apparently having an open mind means 'having an open mind to stuff you want to hear'. You have clearly done zero research into the possibility that the information might be wrong. This is called 'confirmation bias', and their strict avoidance of this is what makes a scientist infinitely more open minded than you'll ever be.

There's lots of stuff here that shows that Emoto's results were nonsense.

Masaru Emoto - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

He also sells water which is supposedly magical or whatever, so he's also a con-artist. A good person to learn from.

By his own admission his results were nonsense. What he said he did was make people focus various emotions on water, then take pictures of the water, and then publish those pictures if they seemed to match the emotion and throwing out any that did not aesthetically match it. If you can't see how ridiculous this is then you are lost.