"We're all theory and no action. He is all action and no theory". |
|
What I'm saying is that you have something like karma, a kind of inertia that narrows your possibilities. I'm not doubting your personal experience or your personal, non physics interpretation of it, I'm saying that the 'many worlds' physics idea fails in that it has no provision for karma, currently. |
|
"We're all theory and no action. He is all action and no theory". |
|
EbbTide000's Signature.
My original username was debraJane, later I became Havago. Click link below!
What are Your Thoughts on This?
***
http://www.dreamviews.com/beyond-dre...houghts-2.html
In the current 'scientific' view, an infinite number of quantum 'choices' get made every instant, and they're all entirely random. So the path that you take has no theme or story to it, your 'song of destiny' is white noise. Its true that there would be an infinite number of random paths that seem to be telling a story. But for every one of those, there would be an infinite number where the story is gibberish. So the probability of taking a path where there are 'meaningful coincidences' and whatnot or any kind of discernible spiritual 'plan' would be identically zero. There are way, way too many branches for a random path to seem special on account of us reading a narrative into it, which is why I'm saying the typical sci-fi scenario misconstrues the physics idea. Maybe we have some way of 'entangling' ourselves with particular futures, which accounts for the appearance of a story of karma or personal will. But if so, that entanglement is vastly reducing the number of actual branches, which is my point, that something is intelligently pruning the possible outcomes. In other words, the overwhelming majority of speculative futures don't actually happen, all versions of ourselves are avoiding them somehow. Maybe this subconscious, semi-collective pruning reconciles the 'many worlds' idea with your and my experience. But in any case its far outside of the standard 'many worlds' idea. Also, even though the self-entanglement idea seems to make sense in a very vague way, it doesn't completely ring true for me, I don't feel much of 'eureka' when I get the idea. It seems more like my subconscious is saying "that's a tiny step of an idea, but not really it, keep looking". |
|
I think the idea needs to be reconciled but that doesn't mean it's mutually exclusive. Let's look at what affects our reality. First, there's our choices, and second, there's the shape of our attitude. Shaping our attitude is also a choice, but for the purpose of keeping it in the context of my theory on RV and AP I'm creating a temporary duality between mental expressions and physical ones. |
|
Everything works out in the end, sometimes even badly.
Sure. |
|
Cool, so we both agree we have no idea what we're talking about or how to rationalize our experiences. |
|
Everything works out in the end, sometimes even badly.
^^ and, I imagine, no idea how to coherently rationalize the remote (and advance) viewing of lottery numbers? |
|
Actually, the question of viewing lottery numbers is more clear cut. We already know that its foolish on a number of levels. |
|
Exactly, the belief you can Remote View the lottery is like trying to impose materialist causality and determinism upon an activity materialists presume impossible. |
|
Everything works out in the end, sometimes even badly.
Are you good at remote viewing lottery numbers? I get a lot of visions which have all manifested but I'm currently trying to remote view the Euromillion lottery numbers and it's pretty hard. Would you be able to help me? I'd me more than happy to give you a share of my winnings if you could help. |
|
This thread has been inactive for almost 4 years, and most of the original posters are not around anymore. Please do not revive inactive threads - this is called necroposting and is against forum rules. If you wish to discuss this topic, please start a new thread instead. |
|
"Going through life worrying about the little things is like cooking with motor oil instead of cooking oil. Sure, you can still probably pull it off, but it'll leave a bad taste in your mouth in retrospect." - Me, apparently
2015: 101 LDs, 2016: 114 LDs, 2017: 38 LDs, 2018: 20 LDs, 2019: 8 LDs
DreamViews Discord!
Bookmarks