Originally Posted by Dianeva
It wasn't directed at you specifically. I only skimmed through your post. It was directed to Crashy, with the intention that he might know some people understand what he's going through, so that he doesn't feel he's being called stupid, on top of everything else he's going through, when he may not be (depends on his reasons for cutting).
I know you weren't aimed at me, but what you said
It's easy for people who have not felt the desire to hurt themselves to advise you not to
, it's aimed for people who did that, which I just tried to do for Crashyy. I know you weren't out to get me, but what you said was for those people in general.
No one is talking about causing harm to another person. I don't know why you kept mentioning that
Because of,
And punching a pillow won't help because you want to cause some actual harm
I know you didn't say "harm another person," I was just responding to how that punching a pillow or whatever object usually leads to someone trying to sublimate that through someone else if they don't know how to moderate the temptation.
Like a person using a punching bag and only using that bag to sublimate their desires to hurt someone. When they become exhausted and feel tired from letting off the steam, they'll realize that when they encounter that person that makes them want to hit them, they'll realize they're not a big deal after all. That's why I responded to that.
But, in any situation, if it seems to make the most sense to do something, then that person will do it. That includes the desires to murder and rape. Even though it makes no sense to the rest of us, everyone is always justified in doing whatever makes the most sense to them. If they've neglected to consider some sensible reason not to, then it is simply an oversight, and they cannot be blamed for the mistake. If they consciously ignore their sense of reason, then that means the desire to murder or w/e was stronger, at the time, than their desire to be reasonable. In either case, the person is not at fault. Either a strong emotion overruled others, or they made a mistake.
I agree with everything but the last two sentences and that they can't be blamed for the mistake. To say that person is not at fault because it's either
a strong emotion overruled others, or they made a mistake,
seems unreasonable, it's still their fault either way. To say they couldn't control their actions, whether if it was unconscious reflexes, etc., those cases usually end up to the person just trying to deny they didn't make the conscious decision (be it through them using the "insanity plea" that isn't supported or other means of justification). And I'm saying this in relation to a person using that as justification as to why they killed someone.
If it feels like cutting oneself is the only thing that's going to help them relieve stress, then the person is going to cut themselves. I am talking about the state of hopelessness in which one doesn't care anymore. Your suggestion that those things are still "more practical than cutting yourself" is irrelevant when you know that they won't help at all.
I think you're misunderstanding things here. I didn't say the other suggestions are fix-it-alls, that's what happens when you skim through the post and didn't see what I actually said. I said those other ways are more practical than cutting yourself because they have a better gradual positive result than just cutting yourself. They don't show results immediately, but if a person keeps practicing them, they will find results, or find other ways from that.
It may not help completely, but it's a more reasonable way of trying to solve the problem, that's why I said they're more practical than cutting yourself. They don't solve the situation, they just have a better chance (but not guarantee obviously) of helping that person come to a better realization and take action that helps them.
Example: A person saying they can get through a certain illness through brute mental devotion and not taking medication that is obviously going to help them. It would obviously be better/practical for them to take the medication instead of thinking it's just a mental game they have to conquer; which is why those other suggestions (and other obvious ones) of sublimating those strong emotions have less detriments and more benefits. They have less risk of a person deciding, "hey it's the best I got and I have to make do with it."
If the person can find healthier ways to relieve themselves, then of course they should do those other things. But, again, I am talking about the state in which it really doesn't feel there is anything else they can do.
And like I've stated in my post before about the extreme state of hopelessness, even if they're so far into the darkness of finding answers, they still have the chance to be aware of other ways to find solution. But it's when they just give up completely ( like when you said they consciously ignore it) is when it makes them more than a victim.
Basically, when someone wants to inflict harm upon themselves, they obviously carry some self-loathing and do not care about themselves. It would be reasonable to assume that, in this situation, they will not care about the long-term effects they'll have to deal with either. They've decided that the benefits of harming themselves outweigh the harm it will cause. Unless, of course, they're simply not thinking about the negative effects, in which case it would help to remind them, or for them to remember themselves.
That's why, if you read the post, I said people do that subconsciously because they fixate on that benefit and forget it's only temporary. It's up to that person to find other ways to find less detriments and more benefits that can last longer without them imposing harm among themselves.
Crashy said that he covers the scars. If other people don't know he has them, then he isn't doing it for attention, unless it's to get attention from the people he tells, like us.
I understand that DreamViews is a way for some people to be comfortable with others because we're usually in that same mentality as them, or at least experienced it before. Even so, it doesn't mean someone else from a random portion of the internet might understand the sense of hospitality/understanding people try to give here on DV. They might take it the wrong way, and get a different impression. From your view, from your own stage of reality, you've already presumed that we're understanding (implied by "us" in your quotations), and that's all fine and good....but from someone who might lurk into the forum and barely know about the modicum of social aspect of it can take it the wrong way.
Which is why people will assume that person is trying to get attention and it can branch off into them showing that to others, making a bad impression. I never said he was seeking attention, I just said people within his same situation usually do. I know he tries his best to show his family and friends that he's alright. I know he doesn't go willy-nilly showing his scars like that to them. I'm just saying that any picture like that gets posted on the Internet has a chance of it being interpreted in the wrong way.
Even if DV is a secure place in your perception, it doesn't mean it won't be distributed somewhere else in the Internet and taken the wrong way. That's all I'm trying to say.
I'm not trying to advocate cutting oneself. I'm just explaining that all actions are justified to the person doing them in that moment. And that, in this case, telling the person that they're being stupid and should do something else instead often won't work.
I'll tell you why it doesn't work. A person going through things like this seeks advice from people who actually experienced it. They have the disposition that this person will surely help them because they conquered it. If they actually followed a person's advice and improve from that, then good!
But when it doesn't work, it's because people don't take action or follow through, it's when they start only relying on other people's experiences and disregards anyone's advice that didn't experience it; knowing clear as day that advice from both sides have the same suggestion, that's when they reached the point of rejection and losing progress of improving.
This is why when you said,
It's easy for people who have not felt the desire to hurt themselves to advise you not to, and to think it's a stupid decision. To say that there's no point to it.
I felt as if this was just irrational. Because whatever the source of advice is coming from, whether it's from someone experienced in it or not, the person receiving it doesn't take into consideration and take action. That's why it's irrelevant to you, which just didn't make sense at all. The advice is there, but if the person getting advice doesn't follow it or take action, that's when the advice is useless or pointless to them at the moment.
Maybe in some cases, the person really just wanted attention, wanted someone to tell them to stop, or they really weren't thinking rationally and are helped in being reminded of the negative impacts. But, most of the time, people aren't that stupid. We've all heard countless anti-self-harm awareness videos/posts/ads/opinions. They know all of the negative impacts but are still deciding to do it because the emotion is just that strong.
Of course! But those people aren't stupid, it's just that they weren't aware, and people won't directly make it obvious that they use attention from others to come to a realization, that's why it's done subconsciously without them knowing about it.
Also, cutting really isn't that bad. People just hype it up to make it seem worse than it is. You aren't doing any permanent harm to yourself. Sure, you risk infection, but some skateboarder or mountain climber who gets cut up in a more socially acceptable way might also risk infection, and they aren't ostracized. Besides that, there is scarring, which I think is a valid concern.
Well, you have the understanding that it's not that bad because you didn't go that far into extremism, but like you said, there are people who hype it up too much and go too far into it (and they can do that extremism physically). Even though you didn't really do things that damaging, people might start getting even more serious and go crazy. There's still people that can make deeper cuts and potentially be at risk for more things other than an infection. The comparison to another person being likely to get an infection as a socially acceptable way isn't really getting anywhere here, yes, I know there's other ways a person can get an infection, but that's because they didn't have intention.
When the person does have intention through cutting (whether or not they were aware of it), it's a completely different spectrum. When there's intent, it has to be taken differently than things that can happen unintentionally. And to say a person may cut themselves unintentionally when they're cutting themselves, as if they went into a trance or something is just silliness; it's still a part of themselves that's doing it.
Again, I'm not saying that anyone should cut themselves. It doesn't really solve anything and I'd agree that it's ultimately 'bad' to do in most cases. But it still makes sense for the person who is doing it at the time. Most people don't seem to understand the state in which you don't care anymore about the negative effects of self-harm. If someone wants to hurt themselves, they've often considered it all, but decide to do it anyway because the desire is just that strong.
I don't think you're trying to be a bad person or trying to support anything like that, but I saw you were going through a lot of denying and assuming a certain action isn't so bad when it's clearly not because people can go further than what you did.
At that point, someone pointing out to them that they shouldn't cut themselves because it won't solve anything is just an annoyance.
Which brings me back to what I said that other ways are at least more reasonable than just giving up. To say that it's an annoyance is what makes it irrational to think so. (I know you're just saying it in the perspective of the person cutting themselves though)
---
Anyway, I didn't want to have any bad intentions for you if you're wondering that, and I'm sorry if it seemed like I did. I know you're a good person, it's just the ideas you mentioned felt unreasonable, but I wasn't aiming at you as a person, just the ideas.
|
|
Bookmarks