I know exactly what you are saying, but you are wrong. What you are not factoring into this discussion is that the first person saw that human polluting might cause global warming in 1896. They showed evidence that carbon dioxide was absorbing more heat in 1940. They had clear evidence of global warming in the 1980's. This is all before I was even born. I was born in 83, and before I was born there was already evidencing supporting global warming. 30 years later the evidence is still piling up at an obscene rate.

It isn't like this is some obscure, rarely studied topic where there isn't much evidence to support either side. There isn't conflicting data. I have read all the counter arguments against global warming, and they never have data that goes against global warming. What they usually have is data which is being misrepresented, and when you look into the data you see that the data isn't saying what they believe it does.

I look at every single piece of evidence that people who are against climate change have. I have to, because you have to understand what it is saying before you can refute it. However you never find new and original things in these discussions, it is always the same old stuff that has been proven wrong a million times. At some point you have to say enough is enough. Saying things like the earth is cooling and that proves global warming is untrue, which is common for people who are arguing against climate change, is blatantly untrue. That is not an argument that should be allowed in any serious discussion. At some point you have to say something is just wrong and isn't a legitimate argument because it makes no sense or is based on faulty or misunderstood data.

Also, I am pretty skeptical of the claim that you seem to think people are against global warming based off being labeled. I am not sure where you get that from. It seems like the reason people are against global warming is because of big oil companies lobbing the government to push anti climate change ideology, because laws to restrict pollution and find green energy alternatives may hurt them.