Quote Originally Posted by Voldmer View Post
With that statement you demonstrate your unquestioning faith in these sources. A religious devotee of any faith and denomination would approve.
But that is the difference between scientists and a "religious devotee." The 97% source (see also theconsensusproject.com) is based on thousands of peer reviewed science papers! That is hardly equivalent to "faith." It is not unusual for there to be a few science papers that upon peer review are determined to be faulty in some way or subsequent experiments are not able to duplicate the original results. What we have in this case instead is an overwhelming majority of peer reviewed science papers that all come to the same general conclusion that global warming is happening and that it is primarily man made. Your skepticism is not of faith but seems to be a skepticism of knowledge (science derives from the latin scientia meaning knowledge) and a skepticism of the scientific method and the process of peer review.